Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 2910601" data-attributes="member: 8158">I've read what you're written. Now I am explaining to you that you have not supported your assertion.Case in point:You state your belief. You say nothing to support it. Please explain how mechanical disadvantages translate into good-roleplaying. A STR 8 fighter, a DEX 8 rogue, and INT wizard--how do these sacrifices in effectiveness constitute good-roleplaying? I hope another "read my previous posts" cop-out is not forthcoming. Your previous posts didn't answer the question.Imagine you were DM'ing Lord of the Rings as a campaign. How strongly do you agree with the following assertion: Aragorn, Legalos, and Gandalf are munchkins because they're outstanding at what they do. Meanwhile, Gimli and the hobbits are all commendable characters by dint of their physical shortcomings.</blockquote>