Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is Min/Maxing viewed as bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DM-Rocco" data-source="post: 2911528" data-attributes="member: 14451"><p>Interesting topic.</p><p></p><p>I would like to comment before I read others opinions so as not to bias my answer.</p><p></p><p>If you think about it, it is not a bad thing. If you are good at something, why shouldn't you be the best at it. If you are a spell caster, would you take a 12 in your prime spell casting ability? Of course not, why? Mainly because, if you plan on casting spells beyond 2nd level spells, then you need a higher score. This is not the days of AD&D when you could cast just about any spell with a 13 or higher score. Heck, back in the day, Raistlin only had a 17 INT, but as a 26th level black wizard he would not be able to cast 8th and 9th + level spells by todays standards.</p><p></p><p> If you were a spell caster, would you take anything less than 4 ranks in conentration at first level? Would you take anything less than 4 ranks in spell craft? If you do then you are a min/maxer, if you don't then you are not only not a min/maxer but you really are stupid or ignorant of the game as there is nothiong else in the list of skills that a spellcaster must have ranks in in order to be efficient.</p><p></p><p> From my prespective, you need to min/max your character because if you don't, you have a lesser chance of survival and first and foremost, in game as in life, living is what it is all about. When you go to school, do you study art as a major if you are going to be a laywer? Maybe if you are going to be an art laywer, but you certainly would put most of your credits in it.</p><p></p><p> Man, err, okay, women too, have a basic primal instict to survive and they will do that every time. Whether it is in a game or life, you will find yourself min/maxing all the time. Ever drive around a few blocks to find a better price on gas? Then you are min/maxing. Ever ask around on where is a good place to get good pizza? Then you are min/maxing. Ever date one person and then decide that it is not working out the way you would like or cheat on them or any other of a thousand senerios that could take? Then you are min/maxing.</p><p></p><p> In D&D it is not a bad thing to want the best for your character, just like in Monopoly you obviously want all the propoerties, including the elusive Park Place and Board Walk. Now, that said, a game that has Monty Haul aspects to it, is no fun, trust me on that, but that doesn't mean that a 1st level wizard with a 18 INT and max ranks in spellcraft and concentration and spell focus evocation is a wrong design. What would you prefer? 14 INT, no ranks in spellcraft and concentration and skill focus craft (basket weaving)? That would fall under the stupid or ignorant catagory I refered to earlier. Just cause you got good stats and a well thought out plan for how you want your character to progress doesn't mean you can't enjoy the game as someone who is more into role-playing and has a "lessor" character concept.</p><p></p><p> It is the way people, all people, are programmed. Watch out for those that think min/maxing is bad, cause they are the ones trying to sell you the Brooklyn bridge or swamp property in Floridia. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p>In the end, does it really matter if someone has a well thought out plan for their character. If it makes them happy, and it doesn't ruin your basket weaving career, does it really matter if his spell resist DC is 1 or 2 higher than yours?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DM-Rocco, post: 2911528, member: 14451"] Interesting topic. I would like to comment before I read others opinions so as not to bias my answer. If you think about it, it is not a bad thing. If you are good at something, why shouldn't you be the best at it. If you are a spell caster, would you take a 12 in your prime spell casting ability? Of course not, why? Mainly because, if you plan on casting spells beyond 2nd level spells, then you need a higher score. This is not the days of AD&D when you could cast just about any spell with a 13 or higher score. Heck, back in the day, Raistlin only had a 17 INT, but as a 26th level black wizard he would not be able to cast 8th and 9th + level spells by todays standards. If you were a spell caster, would you take anything less than 4 ranks in conentration at first level? Would you take anything less than 4 ranks in spell craft? If you do then you are a min/maxer, if you don't then you are not only not a min/maxer but you really are stupid or ignorant of the game as there is nothiong else in the list of skills that a spellcaster must have ranks in in order to be efficient. From my prespective, you need to min/max your character because if you don't, you have a lesser chance of survival and first and foremost, in game as in life, living is what it is all about. When you go to school, do you study art as a major if you are going to be a laywer? Maybe if you are going to be an art laywer, but you certainly would put most of your credits in it. Man, err, okay, women too, have a basic primal instict to survive and they will do that every time. Whether it is in a game or life, you will find yourself min/maxing all the time. Ever drive around a few blocks to find a better price on gas? Then you are min/maxing. Ever ask around on where is a good place to get good pizza? Then you are min/maxing. Ever date one person and then decide that it is not working out the way you would like or cheat on them or any other of a thousand senerios that could take? Then you are min/maxing. In D&D it is not a bad thing to want the best for your character, just like in Monopoly you obviously want all the propoerties, including the elusive Park Place and Board Walk. Now, that said, a game that has Monty Haul aspects to it, is no fun, trust me on that, but that doesn't mean that a 1st level wizard with a 18 INT and max ranks in spellcraft and concentration and spell focus evocation is a wrong design. What would you prefer? 14 INT, no ranks in spellcraft and concentration and skill focus craft (basket weaving)? That would fall under the stupid or ignorant catagory I refered to earlier. Just cause you got good stats and a well thought out plan for how you want your character to progress doesn't mean you can't enjoy the game as someone who is more into role-playing and has a "lessor" character concept. It is the way people, all people, are programmed. Watch out for those that think min/maxing is bad, cause they are the ones trying to sell you the Brooklyn bridge or swamp property in Floridia. ;) :) :D In the end, does it really matter if someone has a well thought out plan for their character. If it makes them happy, and it doesn't ruin your basket weaving career, does it really matter if his spell resist DC is 1 or 2 higher than yours? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why is Min/Maxing viewed as bad?
Top