Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackwarder" data-source="post: 5882210" data-attributes="member: 6688285"><p>For me, because it bring back the focus on the advanture rather than the combat encounter, vanician magic was flexible, if you found or researched the right spells you could prety much do anything if you learns it before hand.</p><p></p><p>Spells like charm person, transmute mud to rock and rock to mud and many more could be used in combat and outside of it by imaginative players.</p><p></p><p>I know that 4e introduced rituals, and on paper they seem like a great idea, but after five years of playing I can say that in my group they were used only when the DM railroaded their need, that might be because the character sheet didn't print the rituals out but the main reason was that the group was more combat oriented.</p><p></p><p>I like having spells as daily resource, especially if the focuse of the game move from the combat encounter to the advanture itself because than, having daily resource, makes the exploration phase more interesting.</p><p></p><p>The problem with 3rd ed and the 15 minute advanturing day was, IMHO, that groups tended to blow their biggest spells on the first combat encounter and than head back to rest. That was because the game design was focused on the combat encounter and not the advanture itself which lead to each combat encounter trying to be bad ass because if it wasn't the group would just brush it away with no serious consequences (I'm looking at you city of the spider queen).</p><p></p><p>Don't get me wrong here, I'm not bashing 3rd here so please don't see it as a new edition wars post, and I freely admit that the folks I played with for the last couple of decades like to fight but I've been playing with roughly the same people from basic through 2nd Ed AD&D to 3rd and now 4th and there has been a marked change with how we play the game.</p><p></p><p>To sum it up, vanician is good because it puts exploration, interaction and combat on the same playing ground eating from the same bowl of resources, if the game rule will reflect that and put more focus on exploration and interaction than I'll be an happy camper.</p><p></p><p>Warder</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackwarder, post: 5882210, member: 6688285"] For me, because it bring back the focus on the advanture rather than the combat encounter, vanician magic was flexible, if you found or researched the right spells you could prety much do anything if you learns it before hand. Spells like charm person, transmute mud to rock and rock to mud and many more could be used in combat and outside of it by imaginative players. I know that 4e introduced rituals, and on paper they seem like a great idea, but after five years of playing I can say that in my group they were used only when the DM railroaded their need, that might be because the character sheet didn't print the rituals out but the main reason was that the group was more combat oriented. I like having spells as daily resource, especially if the focuse of the game move from the combat encounter to the advanture itself because than, having daily resource, makes the exploration phase more interesting. The problem with 3rd ed and the 15 minute advanturing day was, IMHO, that groups tended to blow their biggest spells on the first combat encounter and than head back to rest. That was because the game design was focused on the combat encounter and not the advanture itself which lead to each combat encounter trying to be bad ass because if it wasn't the group would just brush it away with no serious consequences (I'm looking at you city of the spider queen). Don't get me wrong here, I'm not bashing 3rd here so please don't see it as a new edition wars post, and I freely admit that the folks I played with for the last couple of decades like to fight but I've been playing with roughly the same people from basic through 2nd Ed AD&D to 3rd and now 4th and there has been a marked change with how we play the game. To sum it up, vanician is good because it puts exploration, interaction and combat on the same playing ground eating from the same bowl of resources, if the game rule will reflect that and put more focus on exploration and interaction than I'll be an happy camper. Warder [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
Top