Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5882539" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>You could. Just give them a casting time measured in minutes and a cost and few are going to bother. And that makes your spellbook the spells you know well enough to cast reflexively. (For that matter I have the house rule that a wizard can cast <em>any</em> wizard at will attack power in 3 rounds as long as they don't move - it doesn't happen IME).</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Ultimately I don't mind Vancian casting. What I mind is the classic Wizard (and Cleric) class. Spell points are trying to fix the symptom not the cause.</p><p></p><p>What's wrong with the wizard can be shown easily by looking at Lord of the Rings. In the whole of Lord of the Rings, Gandalf casts about six spells. A third level 3.X specialist wizard can cast seven significant spells (plus cantrips). Per day. And then even if they've spent a night sleeping on a bed of nails (and a night's sleep is something <em>everyone</em> needs so it's not a specific inconvenience), they can cast seven spells the next day. It's absurd by the standards of Lord of The Rings - or just about any protagonist from Appendix N. For that matter I'm not sure <em>Harry Potter</em> normally casts seven spells in a day.</p><p> </p><p>The problems with Vancian magic to me boil down to the same two things.</p><p> </p><p>1: The Wizard has <em>too much magic</em>. A fifth level wizard makes Gandalf look like an amateur. If you cut the wizard (and other primary casting classes) out of the game, the top tier class that remains in the PHB is the <em>Bard</em>. Cut all the primary casters out and the best caster is <em>still</em> right at the top of the power tree.</p><p> </p><p>2: The recharge times are wrong. Resetting your spells should be something much more significant. It works in classic dungeoncrawling where you make far to many wandering monster checks to make an 8 hour rest healthy. And the penalty for recharging isn't a night's rest but schlepping back to town. But for a less focussed game this does not work. It means that for any situation that takes time to unfold the wizard can reprepare quite happily. Make it at least a full day and much more of the problem vanishes.</p><p> </p><p>(3: In 3.X the crafting rules were broken. But that's not inherent).</p><p> </p><p>Most of the spellpoint systems or the like don't fix either of these problems - if anything they make them worse as they mean with a very few versatile spells the wizard always has a good one to hand. "True Vancian" casting with only a handful of prepared spells and needing time in a lab to prepare would be fascinating. But that's not what we have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5882539, member: 87792"] You could. Just give them a casting time measured in minutes and a cost and few are going to bother. And that makes your spellbook the spells you know well enough to cast reflexively. (For that matter I have the house rule that a wizard can cast [I]any[/I] wizard at will attack power in 3 rounds as long as they don't move - it doesn't happen IME). Ultimately I don't mind Vancian casting. What I mind is the classic Wizard (and Cleric) class. Spell points are trying to fix the symptom not the cause. What's wrong with the wizard can be shown easily by looking at Lord of the Rings. In the whole of Lord of the Rings, Gandalf casts about six spells. A third level 3.X specialist wizard can cast seven significant spells (plus cantrips). Per day. And then even if they've spent a night sleeping on a bed of nails (and a night's sleep is something [I]everyone[/I] needs so it's not a specific inconvenience), they can cast seven spells the next day. It's absurd by the standards of Lord of The Rings - or just about any protagonist from Appendix N. For that matter I'm not sure [I]Harry Potter[/I] normally casts seven spells in a day. The problems with Vancian magic to me boil down to the same two things. 1: The Wizard has [I]too much magic[/I]. A fifth level wizard makes Gandalf look like an amateur. If you cut the wizard (and other primary casting classes) out of the game, the top tier class that remains in the PHB is the [I]Bard[/I]. Cut all the primary casters out and the best caster is [I]still[/I] right at the top of the power tree. 2: The recharge times are wrong. Resetting your spells should be something much more significant. It works in classic dungeoncrawling where you make far to many wandering monster checks to make an 8 hour rest healthy. And the penalty for recharging isn't a night's rest but schlepping back to town. But for a less focussed game this does not work. It means that for any situation that takes time to unfold the wizard can reprepare quite happily. Make it at least a full day and much more of the problem vanishes. (3: In 3.X the crafting rules were broken. But that's not inherent). Most of the spellpoint systems or the like don't fix either of these problems - if anything they make them worse as they mean with a very few versatile spells the wizard always has a good one to hand. "True Vancian" casting with only a handful of prepared spells and needing time in a lab to prepare would be fascinating. But that's not what we have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
Top