Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eldritch_Lord" data-source="post: 5882554" data-attributes="member: 52073"><p>In addition to the above points, my main reasons for liking the Vancian system are as follows:</p><p></p><p>1) No siloing of spells. You can prepare all combat spells, or no combat spells, or any permutation. Which means you can spend one day fireballing everything in sight, and another day divining all of your enemies, and another day setting up long-term wards, giving you maximum strategic flexibility. As mentioned before, it basically comes down to being a superior system strategically where AEDU is often superior tactically, and I much prefer a system with both good strategic and good tactical capability to one with mediocre strategic and excellent tactical capability.</p><p></p><p>2) No enforcement of non-combat-ness. This is similar to the above, but in speed rather than number. <em>Wall of stone</em>, <em>silent image</em>, and <em>teleport</em> are in theory non-combat spells, and some people lament being able to cast them so quickly (mostly the people who think that you should require the preparation of some utility spells because combat spells are better, protip, they're not), but when it comes right down to it <em>every single spell</em> is a combat spell if you're creative enough. If the designers say "This is a non-combat spell, so we should make it not castable in combat," what they're actually saying is either "It's too powerful to be able to cast in combat" or "We're not creative enough to think of combat uses for this." Most of the time when they say it's too powerful for combat they're wrong--seriously, guys, you didn't need to make the 4e Silent Image ritual take forever to cast and cost gold--and the latter case is self-explanatory.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Also: All the time, I see people who dislike Vancian casting but like the ritual system, saying that magic should be long and involved and so forth. Guess what? Vancian casting <em>is</em> a ritual system! You spend a long time casting a ritual...and then at the end, instead of having it take effect immediately, you stick it in stasis in your mind to be released later. All of the heavy lifting gets done in advance, which is why there are no super-long casting times in combat or skill checks--they were all done in relative safety over a few hours.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That isn't a Vancian problem, actually, it's a 3e problem. In AD&D, wizards had many fewer spells (no bonus spells for high attributes, no focused specialist, no widely-available charged items, etc.) and spells took 10-15 minutes per spell level to prepare, each, so it took a 20th level wizard about 2.5 days to prepare all of his spells and he only had about 2/3 the spells of a 20th-level counterpart. Bring back AD&D-style Vancian instead of 3e-style Vancian for 5e, problem solved.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eldritch_Lord, post: 5882554, member: 52073"] In addition to the above points, my main reasons for liking the Vancian system are as follows: 1) No siloing of spells. You can prepare all combat spells, or no combat spells, or any permutation. Which means you can spend one day fireballing everything in sight, and another day divining all of your enemies, and another day setting up long-term wards, giving you maximum strategic flexibility. As mentioned before, it basically comes down to being a superior system strategically where AEDU is often superior tactically, and I much prefer a system with both good strategic and good tactical capability to one with mediocre strategic and excellent tactical capability. 2) No enforcement of non-combat-ness. This is similar to the above, but in speed rather than number. [I]Wall of stone[/I], [I]silent image[/I], and [I]teleport[/I] are in theory non-combat spells, and some people lament being able to cast them so quickly (mostly the people who think that you should require the preparation of some utility spells because combat spells are better, protip, they're not), but when it comes right down to it [I]every single spell[/I] is a combat spell if you're creative enough. If the designers say "This is a non-combat spell, so we should make it not castable in combat," what they're actually saying is either "It's too powerful to be able to cast in combat" or "We're not creative enough to think of combat uses for this." Most of the time when they say it's too powerful for combat they're wrong--seriously, guys, you didn't need to make the 4e Silent Image ritual take forever to cast and cost gold--and the latter case is self-explanatory. Also: All the time, I see people who dislike Vancian casting but like the ritual system, saying that magic should be long and involved and so forth. Guess what? Vancian casting [I]is[/I] a ritual system! You spend a long time casting a ritual...and then at the end, instead of having it take effect immediately, you stick it in stasis in your mind to be released later. All of the heavy lifting gets done in advance, which is why there are no super-long casting times in combat or skill checks--they were all done in relative safety over a few hours. That isn't a Vancian problem, actually, it's a 3e problem. In AD&D, wizards had many fewer spells (no bonus spells for high attributes, no focused specialist, no widely-available charged items, etc.) and spells took 10-15 minutes per spell level to prepare, each, so it took a 20th level wizard about 2.5 days to prepare all of his spells and he only had about 2/3 the spells of a 20th-level counterpart. Bring back AD&D-style Vancian instead of 3e-style Vancian for 5e, problem solved. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why is the Vancian system still so popular?
Top