Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is there a limit to falling damage?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 8031062" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>Fair enough.</p><p></p><p>What if they haven't fallen or seen anyone else fall any significant distance? I've played in campaigns where we made it to mid/high levels without ever taking falling damage. If the party contains a character who prepares feather fall, this is actually quite likely.</p><p></p><p>In any case, I disagree that a few falls would justify a character having a clear understanding of hit points and the "rules" of falling. The dice are variable. Sometimes a character might fall 60' and only take 6 damage. Other times they fall a mere 30' but take 18 damage. Even if we accept the rules as "physics", it would take a large number of falls to get a proper picture of how it all works. Sussing out the 20d6 cap would require many falls from heights of 200' or greater, which not many creatures could possibly survive in the first place.</p><p></p><p>That's neither here nor there though, as I don't ascribe to the idea of rules as physics.</p><p></p><p>The only circumstances under which I think that actually makes sense is if the premise of your game is that the <em>players</em> are in an MMORPG or something along those lines, in which case the premise gives you permission to meta game, at least within the context of what the player-characters would know. The players know about hit points because they can see health bars above everyone's heads.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, in a standard TTRPG setup, I don't think that characters are meant to be consciously aware of HP or how falling damage functions. A high level character is confident in their skills and knows they're lucky, but has no concept of hit points. Only the player knows about hp. When the character has lots of hp, they feel great, with attacks that should have killed them going wide. When they are low on hp, they feel like they are on the ropes, with lethal blows coming ever closer to landing.</p><p></p><p>Hence, the character has no idea that they can walk off a 1500' cliff and survive without serious injury. Even if it has happened to them before, they'd simply believe that they were immensely lucky. However, no sane individual would want to push that luck and risk almost certain death just because they're feeling lazy. IMO, the only way to "justify" such action is if the player is meta gaming.</p><p></p><p>The characters perceive their world in essentially the same way as we perceive our own world. They are therefore unaware of game abstractions such as hit points, which only exist in the context of the game, rather than being a construct within the campaign world itself.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 8031062, member: 53980"] Fair enough. What if they haven't fallen or seen anyone else fall any significant distance? I've played in campaigns where we made it to mid/high levels without ever taking falling damage. If the party contains a character who prepares feather fall, this is actually quite likely. In any case, I disagree that a few falls would justify a character having a clear understanding of hit points and the "rules" of falling. The dice are variable. Sometimes a character might fall 60' and only take 6 damage. Other times they fall a mere 30' but take 18 damage. Even if we accept the rules as "physics", it would take a large number of falls to get a proper picture of how it all works. Sussing out the 20d6 cap would require many falls from heights of 200' or greater, which not many creatures could possibly survive in the first place. That's neither here nor there though, as I don't ascribe to the idea of rules as physics. The only circumstances under which I think that actually makes sense is if the premise of your game is that the [I]players[/I] are in an MMORPG or something along those lines, in which case the premise gives you permission to meta game, at least within the context of what the player-characters would know. The players know about hit points because they can see health bars above everyone's heads. On the other hand, in a standard TTRPG setup, I don't think that characters are meant to be consciously aware of HP or how falling damage functions. A high level character is confident in their skills and knows they're lucky, but has no concept of hit points. Only the player knows about hp. When the character has lots of hp, they feel great, with attacks that should have killed them going wide. When they are low on hp, they feel like they are on the ropes, with lethal blows coming ever closer to landing. Hence, the character has no idea that they can walk off a 1500' cliff and survive without serious injury. Even if it has happened to them before, they'd simply believe that they were immensely lucky. However, no sane individual would want to push that luck and risk almost certain death just because they're feeling lazy. IMO, the only way to "justify" such action is if the player is meta gaming. The characters perceive their world in essentially the same way as we perceive our own world. They are therefore unaware of game abstractions such as hit points, which only exist in the context of the game, rather than being a construct within the campaign world itself. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is there a limit to falling damage?
Top