Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mirrorrorrim" data-source="post: 9337521" data-attributes="member: 7040132">I agree with the lich. I was a Warlord fan. It was my first 4E character and I loved supporting the party. But what I realized is that I liked the abilities, and really wanted those leadership abilities to be available to any class.One playtest concept I really hoped stuck (but didn't) was for all classes to have the same subclass level progression. That would have allowed class-agnostic subclasses that any class could take.Imagine a "Commander" subclass with a "maneuver/exploit-like" subsystem built in that any class could take. Such "maneuver/exploit" system could even have magical options for the caster/gish classes. Feats and Weapon Masteries are other ways they could have leaned into Warlord-friendly abilities.THAT would have been my ideal "Warlord."</blockquote>