Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="LuisCarlos17f" data-source="post: 9339711" data-attributes="member: 6802378">My opinion is the future warlord will be designed to can be played in mass battles, but this is not ready yet.Maybe the future warlord class is right for dungeon-crawling, but if later there is a &quot;module&quot; about mass battles, because the buffs by the warlord then this class could be overpowered in the battle field.Other point is some not all D&amp;D players use a tabletop and miniatures. Then a warlord too focused into bonus-areas or like this isn't too interesting for these last players.Should the warlord to be a &quot;no-magic buffer&quot;? Could a subclass cast magic? Could can the warlord class to be not only useful but also fun to be played?Or could be the warlord a subclass of martial adepts focused in the school of the white raven?* In a mass battle there aren't time for rest.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="LuisCarlos17f, post: 9339711, member: 6802378"] My opinion is the future warlord will be designed to can be played in mass battles, but this is not ready yet. Maybe the future warlord class is right for dungeon-crawling, but if later there is a "module" about mass battles, because the buffs by the warlord then this class could be overpowered in the battle field. Other point is some not all D&D players use a tabletop and miniatures. Then a warlord too focused into bonus-areas or like this isn't too interesting for these last players. Should the warlord to be a "no-magic buffer"? Could a subclass cast magic? Could can the warlord class to be not only useful but also fun to be played? Or could be the warlord a subclass of martial adepts focused in the school of the white raven? * In a mass battle there aren't time for rest. [/QUOTE]

Verification