Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Pauln6" data-source="post: 9341194" data-attributes="member: 6777422">This is very true.&nbsp; This is just a pale imitation warlord and a very specific trope but at least it's one that is achievable with a Tasha-style minimal tweak alternate class feature.&nbsp; The changes to the fighter, giving them more uses of second wind might help the Banneret here as well.&nbsp; Other possible changes could be to give them the martial versatility fighting style for free at level 3 but with a set of choices limited to the warlord type manoeuvres.&nbsp; Then later you could let them recharge their manoeuvres when they use second wind, which might make up for the limitations on their healing ability.It's tricky to improve the Banneret without stealing too many of the Battlemaster's toys but I don't think the warlord style manoeuvres are among the more popular ones, so the limited list may be a balancing factor along with 1d6 dice. There are a lot of potential manoeuvres missing from the fighter list mind you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pauln6, post: 9341194, member: 6777422"] This is very true. This is just a pale imitation warlord and a very specific trope but at least it's one that is achievable with a Tasha-style minimal tweak alternate class feature. The changes to the fighter, giving them more uses of second wind might help the Banneret here as well. Other possible changes could be to give them the martial versatility fighting style for free at level 3 but with a set of choices limited to the warlord type manoeuvres. Then later you could let them recharge their manoeuvres when they use second wind, which might make up for the limitations on their healing ability. It's tricky to improve the Banneret without stealing too many of the Battlemaster's toys but I don't think the warlord style manoeuvres are among the more popular ones, so the limited list may be a balancing factor along with 1d6 dice. There are a lot of potential manoeuvres missing from the fighter list mind you. [/QUOTE]

Verification