Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is There No Warlord Equivalent in 5E?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9343585" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Yes, it is. For pretty much every outright Warlord fan I've ever spoken to, healing is in fact a requirement. Hence why it's so terrifically infuriating when that's the first thing every proposal puts on the chopping block.</p><p></p><p>The Warlord needs to be able to fill the support slot, even in parties without a single person who can cast <em>cure wounds</em> or <em>healing word</em>. That means real, actual, honest-to-God healing. It may be less healing than what a Cleric or Bard could produce (in fact, by level 4-6, I would absolutely expect the Warlord to be simply outclassed for healing, unless said Warlord has actively and aggressively pursued being a really, really, really good healer--and even then he should be struggling to keep up.) But it can't be zero healing, "only THP healing," only damage prevention/mitigation, etc. Sufficient amounts of those things that could actually obviate the need for healing would be severely unbalanced--and would make any party that <em>does</em> have magical healing even worse than a party that had to rely on the Warlord alone.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is: it's also quite easy to <em>die</em> in my experience. Especially in the earliest levels, and/or in parties that don't have magic. I would know. I <em>am</em> the (Celestial Warlock) healer of a mostly-5.0, partly-5.5e game (very kindly run by Hussar), and dear God do we need the healing Celestial brings. If it weren't for my spell slots and daily Healing Radiance dice, things would have gone significantly worse for the party...and we've also had to rely on something like 15+ healing potions on top of that.</p><p></p><p>Hit Dice help, sure. They are <em>emphatically nowhere near</em> enough to keep up with the allegedly-expected 6-8 combat encounters a day, doubly so once you've spent one night out in the field, since you only get back half your HD, not all of them. That's where the Warlord's stuff comes in. It helps keep people off the floor and still in the fight. Temporary hit points cannot do that. They do absolutely, positively <em>nothing</em> for someone unconscious. They don't even cause a person to stabilize.</p><p></p><p>It is, simply put, utterly non-negotiable that any 5e Warlord be able to provide at least <em>some</em> healing. It doesn't have to be much--I quite liked the idea of "recipient spends a Hit Die and adds the Warlord's Leadership modifier on top"--but it's gotta be <em>something</em>. Linking it to Hit Dice serves the double purpose of calling back to 4e's mechanics (even if 5e Hit Dice have only the thinnest superficial similarity to Healing Surges), and mollifies the rustled jimmies over "no-cost healing" or various other common martial-healing gripes.</p><p></p><p></p><p>See, that's my point here. Warlords should not be comparable to frontline Fighters/Paladins/etc., unless they've invested in doing so. They're tricksy, wily, clever bastards, who should be at a slight distance removed. Pushing too much <em>automatic, inherent</em> warrior-ness into the class is a huge part of why the Fighter chassis doesn't work. It closes off too much other, valid, interesting design space because the Fighter chassis is already so roided out guns-blazing for personal effort. You can't take away core class features, but you can add them in with subclasses (and, as another perk of the Warlock-style/"fractal" class model, "invocation"-type selected features can do this too.)</p><p></p><p>We already know Extra Attack can be a subclass-specific feature (see: Bard, Blade Pact), as can heavier armor (Cleric, and BG3 offers it to Rangers as well). It makes sense that at least one subclass of Warlord should truly be a front-line warrior, standing shoulder to shoulder with the Barbarian, Fighter, Ranger, and/or Paladin. Hence my mention of the "Vanguard" subclass getting +1 HP/class level the way Dragon Sorcerers do, and I'd add heavy armor on top of that.</p><p></p><p>By leaving those things for folks who want to specialize in full-on warrior badassery, we can give folks who like that stuff exactly what they're hoping for, without forcing EVERYONE to deal with that being baked in.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9343585, member: 6790260"] Yes, it is. For pretty much every outright Warlord fan I've ever spoken to, healing is in fact a requirement. Hence why it's so terrifically infuriating when that's the first thing every proposal puts on the chopping block. The Warlord needs to be able to fill the support slot, even in parties without a single person who can cast [I]cure wounds[/I] or [I]healing word[/I]. That means real, actual, honest-to-God healing. It may be less healing than what a Cleric or Bard could produce (in fact, by level 4-6, I would absolutely expect the Warlord to be simply outclassed for healing, unless said Warlord has actively and aggressively pursued being a really, really, really good healer--and even then he should be struggling to keep up.) But it can't be zero healing, "only THP healing," only damage prevention/mitigation, etc. Sufficient amounts of those things that could actually obviate the need for healing would be severely unbalanced--and would make any party that [I]does[/I] have magical healing even worse than a party that had to rely on the Warlord alone. The problem is: it's also quite easy to [I]die[/I] in my experience. Especially in the earliest levels, and/or in parties that don't have magic. I would know. I [I]am[/I] the (Celestial Warlock) healer of a mostly-5.0, partly-5.5e game (very kindly run by Hussar), and dear God do we need the healing Celestial brings. If it weren't for my spell slots and daily Healing Radiance dice, things would have gone significantly worse for the party...and we've also had to rely on something like 15+ healing potions on top of that. Hit Dice help, sure. They are [I]emphatically nowhere near[/I] enough to keep up with the allegedly-expected 6-8 combat encounters a day, doubly so once you've spent one night out in the field, since you only get back half your HD, not all of them. That's where the Warlord's stuff comes in. It helps keep people off the floor and still in the fight. Temporary hit points cannot do that. They do absolutely, positively [I]nothing[/I] for someone unconscious. They don't even cause a person to stabilize. It is, simply put, utterly non-negotiable that any 5e Warlord be able to provide at least [I]some[/I] healing. It doesn't have to be much--I quite liked the idea of "recipient spends a Hit Die and adds the Warlord's Leadership modifier on top"--but it's gotta be [I]something[/I]. Linking it to Hit Dice serves the double purpose of calling back to 4e's mechanics (even if 5e Hit Dice have only the thinnest superficial similarity to Healing Surges), and mollifies the rustled jimmies over "no-cost healing" or various other common martial-healing gripes. See, that's my point here. Warlords should not be comparable to frontline Fighters/Paladins/etc., unless they've invested in doing so. They're tricksy, wily, clever bastards, who should be at a slight distance removed. Pushing too much [I]automatic, inherent[/I] warrior-ness into the class is a huge part of why the Fighter chassis doesn't work. It closes off too much other, valid, interesting design space because the Fighter chassis is already so roided out guns-blazing for personal effort. You can't take away core class features, but you can add them in with subclasses (and, as another perk of the Warlock-style/"fractal" class model, "invocation"-type selected features can do this too.) We already know Extra Attack can be a subclass-specific feature (see: Bard, Blade Pact), as can heavier armor (Cleric, and BG3 offers it to Rangers as well). It makes sense that at least one subclass of Warlord should truly be a front-line warrior, standing shoulder to shoulder with the Barbarian, Fighter, Ranger, and/or Paladin. Hence my mention of the "Vanguard" subclass getting +1 HP/class level the way Dragon Sorcerers do, and I'd add heavy armor on top of that. By leaving those things for folks who want to specialize in full-on warrior badassery, we can give folks who like that stuff exactly what they're hoping for, without forcing EVERYONE to deal with that being baked in. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is There No Warlord Equivalent in 5E?
Top