Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is wotc still aiming for PCs with 10 *real word* feet of range? W/o vision range penalty/limit rules for the GM?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Willie the Duck" data-source="post: 9012267" data-attributes="member: 6799660"><p>The thread has moved on, but I wanted to get to this. Firstly, if the response is "well I don't have fights at those ranges", that is not and indication that "there is absolutely a problem." It is a neutral point. If people aren't doing a thing, we do not know if changing the rules around doing the thing would make them start doing the thing or not (much less whether it was the existing rules that caused them not to do the thing). </p><p>Beyond that, we are clearly trying to answer different questions. I'm trying to explain why I think the rules are the way they are, and why they have not been changed. You are clearly arguing for a change in the rules to address a perceived problem. Towards that, I pretty much land here:</p><p></p><p>As in, great, good, do your thing, knock your bad self out, etc. I don't see this as a major problem in games I've witnessed, nor does the presence of a rule which might be 'unrealistic' or incentivizing specific playstyles* overly bother me, but if you care passionately about it, go right ahead -- advocate for a rules change for the next version of the game, make the changes at your own table. </p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*5e's ruleset which favors ranged builds bothers me more in that there are few downsides to going Dex-based (you can still melee well, while Str-based characters suffer when switching to ranged), the stat gets used for everything else as well, and Crossbow Expert and Sharpshooter eliminates most constraints that limited such builds in other editions.</span></p><p></p><p>As Hussar pointed out, this is yards</p><p></p><p>Chainmail, oD&D, AD&D (1&2), and all of the basic-classic line have outdoor missile ranges in yards. The Basic books from J. Eric Holmes, Thomas Moldvay, and Frank Mentzer do list ranges in feet, but that is because the basic books are intended for levels 1-3 and for dungeon-crawling exclusively. Those versions of the basic-classic line with Expert sets include clarification like (form the Cook Expert Set, p.X19) <em>"Unlike dungeons, the basic measure of distance in the wilderness is yards instead of feet. ... Missile and spell ranges are also read as yards in the wilderness."</em> </p><p></p><p>This is pretty much not the case. This was my central point from the beginning. Bows have had ranges of ~600' since 1974 when Chainmail came out. It made more sense there--it was a game of massed formations, and the standard measurement increment was 1"=10yd. It was ported into D&D unchanged, and has been carried through without adjustment undoubtedly because (IMO) no one has decided it was important enough to alter (certainly not worth any blowback for changing it that might occur). 3rd edition did change something*, but it was the standardization of 5' square as the combat measurement unit of choice. </p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*3rd and later editions have also altered other factors of archery combat, making it easier to be specifically-archery-focused (as opposed to all warriors being switch-hitters). </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Willie the Duck, post: 9012267, member: 6799660"] The thread has moved on, but I wanted to get to this. Firstly, if the response is "well I don't have fights at those ranges", that is not and indication that "there is absolutely a problem." It is a neutral point. If people aren't doing a thing, we do not know if changing the rules around doing the thing would make them start doing the thing or not (much less whether it was the existing rules that caused them not to do the thing). Beyond that, we are clearly trying to answer different questions. I'm trying to explain why I think the rules are the way they are, and why they have not been changed. You are clearly arguing for a change in the rules to address a perceived problem. Towards that, I pretty much land here: As in, great, good, do your thing, knock your bad self out, etc. I don't see this as a major problem in games I've witnessed, nor does the presence of a rule which might be 'unrealistic' or incentivizing specific playstyles* overly bother me, but if you care passionately about it, go right ahead -- advocate for a rules change for the next version of the game, make the changes at your own table. [SIZE=1]*5e's ruleset which favors ranged builds bothers me more in that there are few downsides to going Dex-based (you can still melee well, while Str-based characters suffer when switching to ranged), the stat gets used for everything else as well, and Crossbow Expert and Sharpshooter eliminates most constraints that limited such builds in other editions.[/SIZE] As Hussar pointed out, this is yards Chainmail, oD&D, AD&D (1&2), and all of the basic-classic line have outdoor missile ranges in yards. The Basic books from J. Eric Holmes, Thomas Moldvay, and Frank Mentzer do list ranges in feet, but that is because the basic books are intended for levels 1-3 and for dungeon-crawling exclusively. Those versions of the basic-classic line with Expert sets include clarification like (form the Cook Expert Set, p.X19) [I]"Unlike dungeons, the basic measure of distance in the wilderness is yards instead of feet. ... Missile and spell ranges are also read as yards in the wilderness."[/I] This is pretty much not the case. This was my central point from the beginning. Bows have had ranges of ~600' since 1974 when Chainmail came out. It made more sense there--it was a game of massed formations, and the standard measurement increment was 1"=10yd. It was ported into D&D unchanged, and has been carried through without adjustment undoubtedly because (IMO) no one has decided it was important enough to alter (certainly not worth any blowback for changing it that might occur). 3rd edition did change something*, but it was the standardization of 5' square as the combat measurement unit of choice. [SIZE=1]*3rd and later editions have also altered other factors of archery combat, making it easier to be specifically-archery-focused (as opposed to all warriors being switch-hitters). [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why is wotc still aiming for PCs with 10 *real word* feet of range? W/o vision range penalty/limit rules for the GM?
Top