Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Jargon is Bad, and Some Modern Resources for RPG Theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 8655015" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>I will address this very briefly, as I choose specifically not to in the post you are replying to.</p><p></p><p>There seems to be confusion regarding two separate issues; the first is regarding conversations on <strong>these discussions boards</strong>. On this, I tend to largely agree with [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] and [USER=7030755]@Malmuria[/USER] - which is to say ... know your audience. Look at the threads. Once you exclude the Geek Media threads, do you notice anything? The vast majority of them are about 5e. And then older editions of D&D. And then Level Up (which is advanced 5e). This board covers general TTRPG topics, but is so firmly entrenched in "D&D" that it was one of the few websites specifically called out on the last, 34 hour survey on D&D by WoTC (the time taken is approximate, but feels accurate).</p><p></p><p>With that in mind, when you are already in a place with large numbers of D&D players, and you are employing a theory (pace [USER=7030755]@Malmuria[/USER] that is, at best, seen as dismissive of D&D and trad games, and at worst, is considered hostile to "trad" games), you will likely get pushback on the jargon as people will not accept it. That's neither good, nor bad, but is.</p><p></p><p>That's separate from what I was just saying, which is that there is a lot of stuff out there since the Forge. And the games that are out there may have some debt to those theories, but if you <em>listen to the people designing games today</em>, as opposed to the players theorizing on these boards, they eschew those restrictive labels. And sometimes, when people try and discuss other new games and styles that aren't trad and also aren't under narrativism, we end up with pushback (sometimes very aggressive pushback) regarding those indie games and theories, and demands that we justify it under Forge jargon. Which ... again, if you aren't doing "N," isn't helpful.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But yes, I am glad you have found games and a play style that you find satisfying! And I hope that you are able to discuss it with others in an open and productive way here, and that you accord others the same respect when they are discussing other issues as well. That's how it should be! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 8655015, member: 7023840"] I will address this very briefly, as I choose specifically not to in the post you are replying to. There seems to be confusion regarding two separate issues; the first is regarding conversations on [B]these discussions boards[/B]. On this, I tend to largely agree with [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] and [USER=7030755]@Malmuria[/USER] - which is to say ... know your audience. Look at the threads. Once you exclude the Geek Media threads, do you notice anything? The vast majority of them are about 5e. And then older editions of D&D. And then Level Up (which is advanced 5e). This board covers general TTRPG topics, but is so firmly entrenched in "D&D" that it was one of the few websites specifically called out on the last, 34 hour survey on D&D by WoTC (the time taken is approximate, but feels accurate). With that in mind, when you are already in a place with large numbers of D&D players, and you are employing a theory (pace [USER=7030755]@Malmuria[/USER] that is, at best, seen as dismissive of D&D and trad games, and at worst, is considered hostile to "trad" games), you will likely get pushback on the jargon as people will not accept it. That's neither good, nor bad, but is. That's separate from what I was just saying, which is that there is a lot of stuff out there since the Forge. And the games that are out there may have some debt to those theories, but if you [I]listen to the people designing games today[/I], as opposed to the players theorizing on these boards, they eschew those restrictive labels. And sometimes, when people try and discuss other new games and styles that aren't trad and also aren't under narrativism, we end up with pushback (sometimes very aggressive pushback) regarding those indie games and theories, and demands that we justify it under Forge jargon. Which ... again, if you aren't doing "N," isn't helpful. But yes, I am glad you have found games and a play style that you find satisfying! And I hope that you are able to discuss it with others in an open and productive way here, and that you accord others the same respect when they are discussing other issues as well. That's how it should be! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why Jargon is Bad, and Some Modern Resources for RPG Theory
Top