Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 8671384" data-attributes="member: 29398">I do. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Sure it's not going to pay off very often but what that means is that it'll likely be a spectacular and memorable moment when it does.Then again, I tend to prefer more than some that luck be a somewhat significant part of the game.Where IMO there's many a time when even 1% isn't granular enough for what I want, but getting anything finer-tuned is a headache and so I usually stick with d% for granularity.That said, I've found it's much more efficient to batch a series of tables together once and thereafter roll d1000 (or even d10000) than to roll d20 and-or d100 on a table and then a bunch of subtables (e.g. random magic item determination in the 1e DMG).&nbsp; With one big table like this it's also much easier to leave a gap for later addition of new entries.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 8671384, member: 29398"] I do. :) Sure it's not going to pay off very often but what that means is that it'll likely be a spectacular and memorable moment when it does. Then again, I tend to prefer more than some that luck be a somewhat significant part of the game. Where IMO there's many a time when even 1% isn't granular enough for what I want, but getting anything finer-tuned is a headache and so I usually stick with d% for granularity. That said, I've found it's much more efficient to batch a series of tables together once and thereafter roll d1000 (or even d10000) than to roll d20 and-or d100 on a table and then a bunch of subtables (e.g. random magic item determination in the 1e DMG). With one big table like this it's also much easier to leave a gap for later addition of new entries. [/QUOTE]

Verification