Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 8672914" data-attributes="member: 29398">That's more than a slight loss in resolution, if you're going from +1 (5%) to whatever average-% bonus advantage gives (if memory serves someone once worked out it's about the same on average as +3 or +4 but I forget where or even if I saw that).It's also more than a slight loss in resolution if you're going from +20% (+5 and -1) to flat 0 (adv-disadv cancelling out).But more important, there's no variance to it.  You've got three options - advantage, disadvantage, or flat - and that's it.  Personally, I'd like a lot more possible granularity.The way to get around people wasting time bonus hunting is to have fewer and easy-to-track things be what give bonuses.  As with many other things, 3e went overboard on how much stacking you could do; it's not the model to try emulating here.</blockquote>