Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Technik4" data-source="post: 980370" data-attributes="member: 7211">I've never really thought about it like this, it just sort of came to me. Maybe its just such an inherent thing that I've never even bothered to question it, but it bugs me now, hence this thread.Why are magic weapons the end all and be all? Hmm, well not even that, Why are magic weapons the only viable weapons past adamantine?I mean, I understand that you can only craft a sword so well. I also understand that you can call a certain level of craftsmanship to be so awe-inspiring and impressive that it might as well be "magic" so whats the problem with calling it an enhancement bonus.I also understand that since you can enchant (enhance, whatever) any sword of masterwork quality, having a sword that hadn't been enchanted equal to a +5 sword would be bad, as the sword could then pick up a +1 enhancement for cheaper than a +5 sword would cost to go to +6 (far far cheaper in fact).Basically this boils down to me thinking that perhaps materials are getting too undercut in d&d. An adamantine longsword is roughly equivalent to a +2 sword BUT the adamantine sword required the player to either find adamantine or a seller which had adamantine (read: DMs approval) whereas a regular +2 sword may be more common. And the adamantine sword is 1,000 gp more expensive. And yes, granted it has more hp and hardness, but that isnt my point.There are really strange exotic materials in the d&d world, like baatorian green steel or the tooth of a great wyrm, but unless these materials get enchanted they never really stack up. Not even close.Or what about craftsmanship? Japanese sword-makers made some of the sharpest blades ever produced...100s of years ago, and they were better not from magic but from skill and probably an incredible amount of patience. In other d20 games this can be represented as Masterpiece weapons, but a katana made from a 20th level expert sword-master still doesnt stack up to a katana +3 (made by the sword-mater's apprentice).Does anyone have any thoughts or perhaps alt rules theyve used for making materials and craftsmanship more integral to a great weapon? I don't necessarily want to usurp magic's role, an artifact will always be the most powerful weapon, and it is inherently magical. Thats fine. But I'd like to think that truly exotic materials and/or craftsmanship should be able to compete up to +4 or +5.Another decent d&d reference is from Troy Denning's Archmage series, there are some special swords a wizard makes from a particular darksteel, these blades never rust and cut through armor like it was paper. Part of their power comes from the enhancements, part of it comes from the material it was made from, and I'd like to think that part of their power comes from the person who actually crafted them. In d&d terms they are +5 shadow weave longswords that ignore armor bonuses, basically magical longswords (ala Dragon magazine).Technik</blockquote>

Verification