Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why no WOTC support for Greyhawk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnRTroy" data-source="post: 2302606" data-attributes="member: 2732"><p>Part of the problem with supporting Greyhawk is that the fan base was factionalized from TSR's actions in the late 1980s.</p><p></p><p>Forgotten Realms has the blessing and continued participation of its creator. Most other game worlds were created by committee, with no one person having the key leadership role, with perhaps the exception of Weiss and Hickman when it comes to Dragonlance. Even Eberron has it's creator actively involved.</p><p></p><p>But Greyhawk suffered from Gary's departure. And also suffered because TSR decided to put an "experimental" stamp on the world. Something GH has never recovered from. It started out with crap like the Rose Estes novels and the "joke Castle Greyhawk". Then came "Greyhawk Wars"--designed to shake things up. Afterwards, other writers started to treat it with some respect, but the damage had been done. And some people even disagree on who should be a factor in keeping the game system alive.</p><p></p><p>Wizards obviously looked at the fact that GH names were used in spells, etc, as well as the lack of success of GH products compared to the other lines, and decided to make the campaign more generic. Because of the factionalization of the line, and the fact that 3e changed some of the rules for characters as well, GH became "generic D&D world". I think Greyhawk's weakness and factionalization of its fan base made this the most palitable decision--Realms and Lance had a lot of novels and more published material that they didn't want to contradict, it would be too much work to create a generic world, and the other worlds had specific quirks that weren't "generic D&D fantasy".</p><p></p><p>I don't think there will ever be a true consolidation of the GH base. Gary's Castle Zagyg, if the project can ever get completed, will likely satisfy those looking for the legendary dungeon adventure, but he is unlikely to ever return to GH development since he hates the current D&D incarnation. Writer Carl Sargent, like Roger Moore, appears to have retired from gaming. Erik does his best, but he is limited by what he can do officially. </p><p></p><p>Personally, as a publisher, I wouldn't want to touch this world with a 10-foot pole, because of all this controvesy.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnRTroy, post: 2302606, member: 2732"] Part of the problem with supporting Greyhawk is that the fan base was factionalized from TSR's actions in the late 1980s. Forgotten Realms has the blessing and continued participation of its creator. Most other game worlds were created by committee, with no one person having the key leadership role, with perhaps the exception of Weiss and Hickman when it comes to Dragonlance. Even Eberron has it's creator actively involved. But Greyhawk suffered from Gary's departure. And also suffered because TSR decided to put an "experimental" stamp on the world. Something GH has never recovered from. It started out with crap like the Rose Estes novels and the "joke Castle Greyhawk". Then came "Greyhawk Wars"--designed to shake things up. Afterwards, other writers started to treat it with some respect, but the damage had been done. And some people even disagree on who should be a factor in keeping the game system alive. Wizards obviously looked at the fact that GH names were used in spells, etc, as well as the lack of success of GH products compared to the other lines, and decided to make the campaign more generic. Because of the factionalization of the line, and the fact that 3e changed some of the rules for characters as well, GH became "generic D&D world". I think Greyhawk's weakness and factionalization of its fan base made this the most palitable decision--Realms and Lance had a lot of novels and more published material that they didn't want to contradict, it would be too much work to create a generic world, and the other worlds had specific quirks that weren't "generic D&D fantasy". I don't think there will ever be a true consolidation of the GH base. Gary's Castle Zagyg, if the project can ever get completed, will likely satisfy those looking for the legendary dungeon adventure, but he is unlikely to ever return to GH development since he hates the current D&D incarnation. Writer Carl Sargent, like Roger Moore, appears to have retired from gaming. Erik does his best, but he is limited by what he can do officially. Personally, as a publisher, I wouldn't want to touch this world with a 10-foot pole, because of all this controvesy. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why no WOTC support for Greyhawk?
Top