Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Not? A Variant Captain Fighter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 7912610" data-attributes="member: 82504"><p><strong>Design Note </strong>- Where do we get an at-will or why <strong>Scan for Opening</strong>?</p><p>One of the things in concept I miss from 4e were at-wills and one of the things I need to see out of a Warlord is that they feel like a Warlord every turn. So I figured that was a place to start.</p><p></p><p>One of the assertions tends to be In 5e you need to give up 2 extra attacks to be able to have the design space for a Warlord Scan for Opening just makes that giving up those attacks a dynamic thing. In the process by applying it to the Battlemaster it also gives back the non-all damage all the time at-will to our Battlemaster Fighter</p><p></p><p>More on the balance of it - 5e has been described as having a lot of its numbers being 4e divide by 2 but this is not entirely true (at least in damage and hit points). A translation from 4e land can help us find those varied at-wills, Now at heroic levels in 5e every combatant type has an at-will. Tadah It is an analog to the 4e Rangers Twin Strike although only scaling fully for the Fighter. In 4e at-wills for the most part scaled by a factor of 2x (I would argue the few which didn't were slip ups). A high level ranger got a double power twin strike at higher levels. Functionally the Fighter is the poster boy 4e ranger a multi-attack combatant. His twin strikes are split into 4 instead of being 2 double strength ones.</p><p></p><p>Basically if one uses scan for opening once around after level 5 and twice in end game you are now trading 2 extra attacks for 2 somewhat buffed at-wills (twin strike -with the rangers mark included kind of).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have thought about this and If you simplify it in that way you make it I think significantly more powerful and kind of undermine the concept that you are reading the current situation for instance if you can use it the next fight and similar things actually the way I conceived, it really was less useful for a maneuver like precision attack nor is it useful for a riposte because it is about scanning the situation now. (if you are making a trick shot you know is very unlikely to work it would allow you to do that it is a Robinhood enabler just maybe not the typical use case). Additionally since many maneuvers require an attack actually hit it generally via all eggs in one basket phenomena weakens the overall value as well. Exceptions are fairly few.</p><p></p><p><strong>Scanning for Openings</strong>: When you make an attack action you may forgo one attack from it to enable your next actual attack this encounter to gain a Tactic Die which can be used during this or the next round to perform a maneuver as though you spent a superiority die. You may add your Int/Wis/Charisma in addition to the die if the maneuver calls for a die roll.</p><p></p><p>The adding of a Mental Attribute to the die is kind of a let's encourage the smart fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 7912610, member: 82504"] [B]Design Note [/B]- Where do we get an at-will or why [B]Scan for Opening[/B]? One of the things in concept I miss from 4e were at-wills and one of the things I need to see out of a Warlord is that they feel like a Warlord every turn. So I figured that was a place to start. One of the assertions tends to be In 5e you need to give up 2 extra attacks to be able to have the design space for a Warlord Scan for Opening just makes that giving up those attacks a dynamic thing. In the process by applying it to the Battlemaster it also gives back the non-all damage all the time at-will to our Battlemaster Fighter More on the balance of it - 5e has been described as having a lot of its numbers being 4e divide by 2 but this is not entirely true (at least in damage and hit points). A translation from 4e land can help us find those varied at-wills, Now at heroic levels in 5e every combatant type has an at-will. Tadah It is an analog to the 4e Rangers Twin Strike although only scaling fully for the Fighter. In 4e at-wills for the most part scaled by a factor of 2x (I would argue the few which didn't were slip ups). A high level ranger got a double power twin strike at higher levels. Functionally the Fighter is the poster boy 4e ranger a multi-attack combatant. His twin strikes are split into 4 instead of being 2 double strength ones. Basically if one uses scan for opening once around after level 5 and twice in end game you are now trading 2 extra attacks for 2 somewhat buffed at-wills (twin strike -with the rangers mark included kind of). I have thought about this and If you simplify it in that way you make it I think significantly more powerful and kind of undermine the concept that you are reading the current situation for instance if you can use it the next fight and similar things actually the way I conceived, it really was less useful for a maneuver like precision attack nor is it useful for a riposte because it is about scanning the situation now. (if you are making a trick shot you know is very unlikely to work it would allow you to do that it is a Robinhood enabler just maybe not the typical use case). Additionally since many maneuvers require an attack actually hit it generally via all eggs in one basket phenomena weakens the overall value as well. Exceptions are fairly few. [B]Scanning for Openings[/B]: When you make an attack action you may forgo one attack from it to enable your next actual attack this encounter to gain a Tactic Die which can be used during this or the next round to perform a maneuver as though you spent a superiority die. You may add your Int/Wis/Charisma in addition to the die if the maneuver calls for a die roll. The adding of a Mental Attribute to the die is kind of a let's encourage the smart fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why Not? A Variant Captain Fighter
Top