Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Garthanos" data-source="post: 7919750" data-attributes="member: 82504">That is a stylistic difference in some ways i want to fix potentially multiple existing things to better let them serve their obvious goals, with something which seems like a natural thing ie someone being able to act in attack more can react in attack more. 'for me this is a plausibility issue even'Here is a neat article that breaks down the poverty of the protection fighting style[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://www.brandesstoddard.com/2016/03/dd-5e-the-protection-fighting-style/[/URL]Though I am picturing your aura effect cooler for actually a swordmage with an explosive shield <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />.&nbsp; I do want my defending swordmage to be supported. Letting the fighter do it his way and other defenders do some interesting other methods.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Garthanos, post: 7919750, member: 82504"] That is a stylistic difference in some ways i want to fix potentially multiple existing things to better let them serve their obvious goals, with something which seems like a natural thing ie someone being able to act in attack more can react in attack more. 'for me this is a plausibility issue even' Here is a neat article that breaks down the poverty of the protection fighting style [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.brandesstoddard.com/2016/03/dd-5e-the-protection-fighting-style/[/URL] Though I am picturing your aura effect cooler for actually a swordmage with an explosive shield :p. I do want my defending swordmage to be supported. Letting the fighter do it his way and other defenders do some interesting other methods. [/QUOTE]

Verification