Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Pathfinder?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pauljathome" data-source="post: 5880181" data-attributes="member: 21807"><p>First off, the people who call Pathfinder 3.75 are pretty much right. It has fairly minor changes from the core of 3.5</p><p></p><p>I think that one of the best things that they did was to remove most of the later 3.5 products and its proliferation of new and over powered base classes.</p><p>If you like to use all pf the newer stuff (especially Tome of Battle) then you'll very likely prefer 4th edition to Pathfinder anyway (which is NOT meant to be any kind of jab at anybody. Tastes vary, Pathfinder is NOT for everybody).</p><p></p><p>I really like the simplification of combat maneuvers. In some places the new ones are a little less "realistic" but the simplicity gained more than compensates for that.</p><p></p><p>They reined in a lot of the most egregious spells from 3.5. The whole Polymorph chain being a very good example.</p><p></p><p>I find that I really like the new channeling mechanic for clerics. At least at low to mid levels it means that clerics actually get to use their spells and not just convert everything to cure wounds spells.</p><p></p><p>The biggest single reason to play it over 3.x is, of course, that it is a well supported system with new material (rules and adventures) coming out constantly and with a lot of 3rd party support.</p><p></p><p>That plus the fact that Paizo works really hard to deserve your money. They try and be very responsive and open with their customers. They make you WANT to give them money <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />.</p><p></p><p>I do miss all the prestige classes. Although I think that 3.5 went too far I find that now there are very often NO prestige classes of interest for many characters. But they're coming out with a book this year that may change that <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":-)" title="Smile :-)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":-)" />.</p><p></p><p>And there are various places where they made very minor changes for no significant benefit. It isn't a problem for people learning Pathfinder but I find that at least once a session I instinctively rule based on the 3.x rule and not the slightly changed Pathfinder rule.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pauljathome, post: 5880181, member: 21807"] First off, the people who call Pathfinder 3.75 are pretty much right. It has fairly minor changes from the core of 3.5 I think that one of the best things that they did was to remove most of the later 3.5 products and its proliferation of new and over powered base classes. If you like to use all pf the newer stuff (especially Tome of Battle) then you'll very likely prefer 4th edition to Pathfinder anyway (which is NOT meant to be any kind of jab at anybody. Tastes vary, Pathfinder is NOT for everybody). I really like the simplification of combat maneuvers. In some places the new ones are a little less "realistic" but the simplicity gained more than compensates for that. They reined in a lot of the most egregious spells from 3.5. The whole Polymorph chain being a very good example. I find that I really like the new channeling mechanic for clerics. At least at low to mid levels it means that clerics actually get to use their spells and not just convert everything to cure wounds spells. The biggest single reason to play it over 3.x is, of course, that it is a well supported system with new material (rules and adventures) coming out constantly and with a lot of 3rd party support. That plus the fact that Paizo works really hard to deserve your money. They try and be very responsive and open with their customers. They make you WANT to give them money :-). I do miss all the prestige classes. Although I think that 3.5 went too far I find that now there are very often NO prestige classes of interest for many characters. But they're coming out with a book this year that may change that :-). And there are various places where they made very minor changes for no significant benefit. It isn't a problem for people learning Pathfinder but I find that at least once a session I instinctively rule based on the 3.x rule and not the slightly changed Pathfinder rule. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Pathfinder?
Top