Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7289017" data-attributes="member: 6919838">Your obviously now intentional refusal to acknowledge the difference between challenging a specific carrot- stick result and dismissing the whole of all cartot-stick results shows a lot.Let me show you a quote from someone else on page 1&quot;Since a player most likely wants to see the character advance in power (requiring both levels and, in theory, gold), a death penalty of levels and/or gold is another incentive to pay attention and make good decisions during play. Whether or not it's a good incentive is debatable. &quot;.That poster recognized dearh tax and its effectiveness as not some proven from on high absolute. Did you jump them with murder question from,real life? Did they challenge the holy sociology?If you look at the post i challenged it was even more extreme claims about the benefits of death taxes - video games resave vs better decisions - and i simply said it would affect some, not all. So other than some specific maybe personal thing on your part or trolling, what is the diff between that and this that gets you to,jump all the way to murders talk? Do you have a lot of players in your games that you have sern go all video game resave crazy soon as you reduced or removed death taxes? You mention this massive evidence. Please point to the studies on death tax and video game resave in tabletop rpg play studies...Sent from my VS995 using <a href="http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205" target="_blank">EN World mobile app</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7289017, member: 6919838"] Your obviously now intentional refusal to acknowledge the difference between challenging a specific carrot- stick result and dismissing the whole of all cartot-stick results shows a lot. Let me show you a quote from someone else on page 1 "Since a player most likely wants to see the character advance in power (requiring both levels and, in theory, gold), a death penalty of levels and/or gold is another incentive to pay attention and make good decisions during play. Whether or not it's a good incentive is debatable. ". That poster recognized dearh tax and its effectiveness as not some proven from on high absolute. Did you jump them with murder question from,real life? Did they challenge the holy sociology? If you look at the post i challenged it was even more extreme claims about the benefits of death taxes - video games resave vs better decisions - and i simply said it would affect some, not all. So other than some specific maybe personal thing on your part or trolling, what is the diff between that and this that gets you to,jump all the way to murders talk? Do you have a lot of players in your games that you have sern go all video game resave crazy soon as you reduced or removed death taxes? You mention this massive evidence. Please point to the studies on death tax and video game resave in tabletop rpg play studies... Sent from my VS995 using [URL=http://r.tapatalk.com/byo?rid=93205]EN World mobile app[/URL] [/QUOTE]

Verification