NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Thanee" data-source="post: 2998191" data-attributes="member: 478">Hey, you asked what would be sufficient evidence to me, that the Psion class is not broken. I told you that. If you think it's impossible to create such evidence, then you probably realize why I am so strongly convinced of my opinion about this topic. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I'm pretty much 100% convinced, that Sorcerer and Wizard are about equal (unless the playing style favors Wizards in some fashion, which some playing styles surely do); the Sorcerer is maybe a little behind, because of the fewer options they have, but that's well within normal limits.I'm also 100% convinced, that the Psion is way ahead of the Sorcerer. And this is something most people actually agree with.How do you come to that conclusion?That's most likely right, yep. Under the current circumstances, I see absolutely no reason to allow psionics (and thus create a lot of headaches). Flavorwise, which is the only reason to even think about adding them, they are not really needed, psionics can easily be done via spell-like abilities (i.e. MM 3.5 Mind Flayer) and simple flavor text/description.Noone's loss, really. Psionics add almost nothing new to a game. There's easily 90+% overlap with existing abilities. They can easily be left out and noone will ever notice the 'lack'. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />ByeThanee</blockquote>

Verification