Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Psionics is broken and what to do to fix it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marcus Smythe" data-source="post: 3010944" data-attributes="member: 43198"><p>I just dont see how we can get anywhere in any sort of balance debate if you presuppose your ability to throw out anything you wish, by calling it 'Broken'. Then we arent debating balance as between X and Y, but as between X and whatever you fell like Y is at the time.</p><p></p><p>Or are you strictly limiting your exclusionary principle to Orbs, such that I can safely rely on other things in my arguements, without you having access to a 'doesnt count, broken' whenever I say something you dislike?</p><p></p><p>You do, I hope, understand my reluctance to debate on the terms as they appear to be offered?</p><p></p><p>As for balancing off the baseline and fixing the extremes... agreed, wholeheartedly. With that provisio, I will be honest:</p><p></p><p>1.) I do not belive that any proof or arguement I submit will be in any fashion convincing to you. </p><p></p><p>2.) I belive that the only chance I have to ever carry the day in such a debate is to make the outcome as one sided as possible, because anything less will simply devolve into a debate about which differences have relatively greater value.</p><p></p><p>3.) I am not comfortable with my ability, limited to core only, to decisively prove that Arcane is not just better, but so much better as to render the answer obvious. Core only, I belive its pretty close. Further, that would seem to require me to prove a negative 'Psionics is not Broken'. I am much more comfortable proving a positive 'Arcane can do many things better than Psionics'</p><p></p><p>4.) As, again, we are both well aware of the impact of the baseline assumptions on the character of debate, you will pardon me if I question the purity of your motives, when those pure motives also, purely by happenstance, lead to the set of baseline assumptions that most favour your position and most hinder mine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marcus Smythe, post: 3010944, member: 43198"] I just dont see how we can get anywhere in any sort of balance debate if you presuppose your ability to throw out anything you wish, by calling it 'Broken'. Then we arent debating balance as between X and Y, but as between X and whatever you fell like Y is at the time. Or are you strictly limiting your exclusionary principle to Orbs, such that I can safely rely on other things in my arguements, without you having access to a 'doesnt count, broken' whenever I say something you dislike? You do, I hope, understand my reluctance to debate on the terms as they appear to be offered? As for balancing off the baseline and fixing the extremes... agreed, wholeheartedly. With that provisio, I will be honest: 1.) I do not belive that any proof or arguement I submit will be in any fashion convincing to you. 2.) I belive that the only chance I have to ever carry the day in such a debate is to make the outcome as one sided as possible, because anything less will simply devolve into a debate about which differences have relatively greater value. 3.) I am not comfortable with my ability, limited to core only, to decisively prove that Arcane is not just better, but so much better as to render the answer obvious. Core only, I belive its pretty close. Further, that would seem to require me to prove a negative 'Psionics is not Broken'. I am much more comfortable proving a positive 'Arcane can do many things better than Psionics' 4.) As, again, we are both well aware of the impact of the baseline assumptions on the character of debate, you will pardon me if I question the purity of your motives, when those pure motives also, purely by happenstance, lead to the set of baseline assumptions that most favour your position and most hinder mine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Psionics is broken and what to do to fix it
Top