Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Psionics is broken and what to do to fix it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tikiman" data-source="post: 3028481" data-attributes="member: 43159"><p>This I find interesting. When I basically told you to do this (I think my words were 'experience the system more before fixing it') it was interpreted as an assault on your person in the form of 'you say my opinion is invalid', followed by a prompt ignoring because it didn't agree with you anti-psi position. But when you tell others to do this it is interpreted as a rational justification (even though anyone with a science background knows that the norm has to be proven wrong, not the experimental). Any explanation?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why are you so unwilling to play with the system as it is, XPH only?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Hang on a second there buddy. You're not comparing Core vs. XPH, you're comparing Core to XPH+non-core. It's hard to help you when you're position keeps shifting like this. It is also hard for core vs. XPH rules to help you in a game that contains non-core material. Why don't you make rules tailored to your fix your problem instead of rules designed to fix psionics?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tikiman, post: 3028481, member: 43159"] This I find interesting. When I basically told you to do this (I think my words were 'experience the system more before fixing it') it was interpreted as an assault on your person in the form of 'you say my opinion is invalid', followed by a prompt ignoring because it didn't agree with you anti-psi position. But when you tell others to do this it is interpreted as a rational justification (even though anyone with a science background knows that the norm has to be proven wrong, not the experimental). Any explanation? Why are you so unwilling to play with the system as it is, XPH only? Hang on a second there buddy. You're not comparing Core vs. XPH, you're comparing Core to XPH+non-core. It's hard to help you when you're position keeps shifting like this. It is also hard for core vs. XPH rules to help you in a game that contains non-core material. Why don't you make rules tailored to your fix your problem instead of rules designed to fix psionics? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why Psionics is broken and what to do to fix it
Top