Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tikiman" data-source="post: 3029426" data-attributes="member: 43159">Complete Arcane has errata in it (weaponlike spells chiefly).  How come you can ignore that but you can't ignore it when psionics does the same thing?  Why do you have such a double standard for psionics and magic?And this doesn't change the fact that you are comparing XPH+non-core to core alone.  In fact, this means that you were never comparing XPH to core at any point, but you said you were.  Please stop being disingenuous like this.  It's very hard to not flame someone when they appear to be lying to you.And why can't you use just the errata from the book?</blockquote>