Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why punish a player if they can't come to the game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Troll Wizard" data-source="post: 2552727" data-attributes="member: 17513"><p>I believe I see the difference; you and a few other DMs and players here; you socialize with your friends via playing Dungeons and Dragons. Its important(?) for your DM that all the players remain at the same level, regardless of attendance, role-playing effort or any other reasons. You don't want any of your friends feeling their player-characters might be weak compared to another who hangs out with the group more often. You folks come together to socialize and play D&D or D&D is just the excuse to socialize?</p><p></p><p>I can see that and to a point that happens with all groups. Yet I believe that most (IMO) gamers come together to "play" Dungeons & Dragons. In our games we tend to take the development/growth of PCs more seriously (IMV).</p><p>I play in two groups, my current long-term group (mid 30s-45+ old folks) of seven years meets every Saturday, and we do tend to socialize too much, which does frustrate some of the players who want to play their character, see it advance, fight, role-play, find loot, etc... The rule with all the DMs (almost all have been playing for 25+ years) is no show = no xp. Not one person has ever complained as this being unfair. Despite no show = no xp, PC deaths, item creation xp loss, xp cost spells, etc.. the party remains within two levels of each. </p><p>No one runs another player's PC, in the high level and epic campaigns with all the spells/abilities the character have; it would be impossible to run them effectively.</p><p></p><p>The second group which I just started earlier this year meets one-two times of month (also 30-40 olds) came together to "play" D&D. Conversation outside the game focus is usually stopped by some of the players quicky, because the majority of us have children and/or a SO that worries, we can't play late and thus time is a premium for us. "Playing" D&D is the primary goal with this group, which is fine with me. One player did complain about the rule "no show = no xp", so a compromised was reached where you get someone to run your character and earns 1/2 xp for that PC. I could tell that not everyone was happy with this, some players don't like others controling their PCs and potentially putting them in harm's way. It's worked so far, though I worry about the day that someone gets a non-attending player's PC killed....</p><p></p><p>I guess I don't see the value in giving xp away for free. For me "playing D&D - running my character" is the value, the purpose of getting together. We can always socialize at other times, when we go see movies together, dine out together, etc. I value the time with my PC, I want to control his destiny, I want see his successes and be the one responsible for his failures and death. He is my little paper man, missing some xp because I have to take my kids or wife somewhere is not even a concern for me.</p><p></p><p>In summary, it seems I see two or potentially three different playing styles for D&D groups.</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">People that play D&D to socialize (getting together to socialize with friends is more important, D&D is secondary or just the means to socialize and have fun)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">People that socialize to play D&D (getting together to run their PCs in life and death situations, gain xp and loot is the primary goal, socialize only because of the nature of the game)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">People that come together to socialize and play D&D (getting together to run thier PCs in life and death situations, gain xp and loot and socialize to varying degrees - sometimes they bcome like group 1 and sometimes they move over to group 2.)</li> </ol><p></p><p>I hope this made sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Troll Wizard, post: 2552727, member: 17513"] I believe I see the difference; you and a few other DMs and players here; you socialize with your friends via playing Dungeons and Dragons. Its important(?) for your DM that all the players remain at the same level, regardless of attendance, role-playing effort or any other reasons. You don't want any of your friends feeling their player-characters might be weak compared to another who hangs out with the group more often. You folks come together to socialize and play D&D or D&D is just the excuse to socialize? I can see that and to a point that happens with all groups. Yet I believe that most (IMO) gamers come together to "play" Dungeons & Dragons. In our games we tend to take the development/growth of PCs more seriously (IMV). I play in two groups, my current long-term group (mid 30s-45+ old folks) of seven years meets every Saturday, and we do tend to socialize too much, which does frustrate some of the players who want to play their character, see it advance, fight, role-play, find loot, etc... The rule with all the DMs (almost all have been playing for 25+ years) is no show = no xp. Not one person has ever complained as this being unfair. Despite no show = no xp, PC deaths, item creation xp loss, xp cost spells, etc.. the party remains within two levels of each. No one runs another player's PC, in the high level and epic campaigns with all the spells/abilities the character have; it would be impossible to run them effectively. The second group which I just started earlier this year meets one-two times of month (also 30-40 olds) came together to "play" D&D. Conversation outside the game focus is usually stopped by some of the players quicky, because the majority of us have children and/or a SO that worries, we can't play late and thus time is a premium for us. "Playing" D&D is the primary goal with this group, which is fine with me. One player did complain about the rule "no show = no xp", so a compromised was reached where you get someone to run your character and earns 1/2 xp for that PC. I could tell that not everyone was happy with this, some players don't like others controling their PCs and potentially putting them in harm's way. It's worked so far, though I worry about the day that someone gets a non-attending player's PC killed.... I guess I don't see the value in giving xp away for free. For me "playing D&D - running my character" is the value, the purpose of getting together. We can always socialize at other times, when we go see movies together, dine out together, etc. I value the time with my PC, I want to control his destiny, I want see his successes and be the one responsible for his failures and death. He is my little paper man, missing some xp because I have to take my kids or wife somewhere is not even a concern for me. In summary, it seems I see two or potentially three different playing styles for D&D groups. [list=1] [*]People that play D&D to socialize (getting together to socialize with friends is more important, D&D is secondary or just the means to socialize and have fun) [*]People that socialize to play D&D (getting together to run their PCs in life and death situations, gain xp and loot is the primary goal, socialize only because of the nature of the game) [*]People that come together to socialize and play D&D (getting together to run thier PCs in life and death situations, gain xp and loot and socialize to varying degrees - sometimes they bcome like group 1 and sometimes they move over to group 2.) [/list] I hope this made sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why punish a player if they can't come to the game?
Top