Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="pkt77242" data-source="post: 6462544" data-attributes="member: 59359">First problem I have is that it isn't the DM's game, it is the groups game, and you come off as being very adversarial and are attaching a motivation to all players that want to MC when you are simply incorrect.&nbsp; Not everyone who wants to MC wants to min/max and to attack all players as only wanting to do it for that reason is not fair.&nbsp;&nbsp; Second the EK doesn't cover a fighter/mage because they are severely limited in spell selection.&nbsp; Again you have decided what you think is right and demand that your players play that way and that they can't have a good reason for MC in advance.&nbsp;&nbsp; As to your last point, no they want a fighter and a mage not a fighter who can only cast wizard spells.&nbsp; Also by MCing they don't get all the fighter stuff and all of the wizard stuff, so I have no idea where that is coming from.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="pkt77242, post: 6462544, member: 59359"] First problem I have is that it isn't the DM's game, it is the groups game, and you come off as being very adversarial and are attaching a motivation to all players that want to MC when you are simply incorrect. Not everyone who wants to MC wants to min/max and to attack all players as only wanting to do it for that reason is not fair. Second the EK doesn't cover a fighter/mage because they are severely limited in spell selection. Again you have decided what you think is right and demand that your players play that way and that they can't have a good reason for MC in advance. As to your last point, no they want a fighter and a mage not a fighter who can only cast wizard spells. Also by MCing they don't get all the fighter stuff and all of the wizard stuff, so I have no idea where that is coming from. [/QUOTE]

Verification