Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="steeldragons" data-source="post: 6464168" data-attributes="member: 92511">If that's what was being said, it is certainly not what I was hearing. Seems there were several posts stating the gods' given right of the players to have [or demand] MC in their games, the general level of impotence DMs should be expecting and accepting [and thankful for it! damned dirty DMs.], and the general mistake of not including it/why 5e made it optional in the first place. *shrug*As to my thought process, I imagine you would [find them rigid]. If you require 8 levels of compiling Warlock, Paladin &amp; Sorcerer to get to &quot;fun, diverse and interesting character&quot; then it is a very safe bet you would find everything about my table &quot;rigid&quot; indeed.Thankfully, this is all fun hypothetical discussion and noone is going to be forced to sit down and play with anyone else they might have...&quot;creative differences&quot;...with.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="steeldragons, post: 6464168, member: 92511"] If that's what was being said, it is certainly not what I was hearing. Seems there were several posts stating the gods' given right of the players to have [or demand] MC in their games, the general level of impotence DMs should be expecting and accepting [and thankful for it! damned dirty DMs.], and the general mistake of not including it/why 5e made it optional in the first place. *shrug* As to my thought process, I imagine you would [find them rigid]. If you require 8 levels of compiling Warlock, Paladin & Sorcerer to get to "fun, diverse and interesting character" then it is a very safe bet you would find everything about my table "rigid" indeed. Thankfully, this is all fun hypothetical discussion and noone is going to be forced to sit down and play with anyone else they might have..."creative differences"...with. [/QUOTE]

Verification