Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6464308" data-attributes="member: 48965">First let me say thanks for answering the questions I asked since I'm interested in your answers (otherwise I wouldn't have asked)...&nbsp; I'm going to skip over the parts I think are just us talking past each other, since I believe we've got our own views there and going round in circles isn't going to change much there... and address what I think are the interesting parts...&nbsp;Well I let everyone in the group know that we will re-address the issue at 5th level (we're 3rd now).&nbsp; I did this mainly because I wanted everyone to get their first feat/ability increase at the same time and to put an emphasis on the fact that they will be sacrificing something to multi-class (since at 5th level the martial characters have a chance to get their second attack and the magicals have a chance to learn 3rd level spells) before making the choice to or not to multi-class.&nbsp; Now honestly I think there are some in our group I will strongly recommend against multi-classing, mainly the most casual players(about 5 people out of our total group of 12 who play irregularly) and our youngest player (He's 10 and has some trouble focusing and navigating his abilities for a single class)... that said I won't outright stop them from multi-classing if they really want to.&nbsp; Finally since I play with the same group after this initial campaign, unless there was another reason, I would open multi-classing up in any subsequent campaign. &nbsp; Now this is my question to you, what if at 5th level the majority of the group just wanted to keep playing without multi-classing... would you be okay with that?&nbsp; In other words if it's not just the DM that doesn't want it but also the majority of the group would you be ok with no multi-classing in this particular campaign?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6464308, member: 48965"] First let me say thanks for answering the questions I asked since I'm interested in your answers (otherwise I wouldn't have asked)... I'm going to skip over the parts I think are just us talking past each other, since I believe we've got our own views there and going round in circles isn't going to change much there... and address what I think are the interesting parts... Well I let everyone in the group know that we will re-address the issue at 5th level (we're 3rd now). I did this mainly because I wanted everyone to get their first feat/ability increase at the same time and to put an emphasis on the fact that they will be sacrificing something to multi-class (since at 5th level the martial characters have a chance to get their second attack and the magicals have a chance to learn 3rd level spells) before making the choice to or not to multi-class. Now honestly I think there are some in our group I will strongly recommend against multi-classing, mainly the most casual players(about 5 people out of our total group of 12 who play irregularly) and our youngest player (He's 10 and has some trouble focusing and navigating his abilities for a single class)... that said I won't outright stop them from multi-classing if they really want to. Finally since I play with the same group after this initial campaign, unless there was another reason, I would open multi-classing up in any subsequent campaign. Now this is my question to you, what if at 5th level the majority of the group just wanted to keep playing without multi-classing... would you be okay with that? In other words if it's not just the DM that doesn't want it but also the majority of the group would you be ok with no multi-classing in this particular campaign? [/QUOTE]

Verification