Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why simpler - much simpler - is better
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dethklok" data-source="post: 6243962" data-attributes="member: 6746469"><p>To a certain degree, RPGs are a matter of taste and personal preference. We all know this. But throughout discussions on games with gamers, I almost always find that the attitudes I take for granted are so rare as to be virtually unknown. And most people's typical idea about how much complexity is a good, rarely gets defended, let alone explained to me. So I want to explain my attitude here, and maybe have a discussion about it.</p><p></p><p>At the front page of ENworld right now, you can see a guy with an animated expression talking about Dungeons and Dragons, insisting that "the game can literally be anything you want," and that "anyone who has ever played in a childhood imagination game like, I dunno a tea party, knows how to play the game."</p><p></p><p>This should be totally true.</p><p></p><p>The unfortunate fact is that it's totally wrong.</p><p></p><p>I don't know anyone else who plays with nothing but a blackboard, chalk, and a d20. I don't find people outside my gaming group who sit down outside with paper and coins and a lantern and just <em>play</em>. They never do. They need books. Not one, but many, books <em>plural</em>, full of instructions to tell them how to use their imaginations. They also need pots of dice, and miniature figures, and character sheets - oh, the character sheets they need. Not character cards, character concepts, character themes, or even character sheets in the singular with each player having one sheet. No we're talking about multiple <em>forms</em> filled in and stapled together like a job application or this year's taxes.</p><p></p><p>That almost all of you reading this find that kind of thing fun is something I realize. I get it. I do see that it is indeed true that most of you derive pleasure from all these rules and complications. But I want to at least point out that all of this</p><p></p><p>* is expensive,</p><p>* is time consuming to learn about,</p><p>* slows your games down,</p><p>* limits what you can do, and</p><p>* creates confusion.</p><p></p><p>I play to have an active, immersive, aesthetic, creative experience. I want to be taken away to another place, another time, and explore the beauty, and danger, and terror, and adventure and romance and glory and awe of another world.</p><p></p><p>For me, that is the whole idea of roleplaying.</p><p></p><p>And it seems obvious to me that complicated initiative protocols do not facilitate this. Things like mood music, a few candles, and the occasional illustration are what make this work. If you spend all your money, time, and energy on rules, you can't set up any atmosphere - you can't make a game that I want to play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dethklok, post: 6243962, member: 6746469"] To a certain degree, RPGs are a matter of taste and personal preference. We all know this. But throughout discussions on games with gamers, I almost always find that the attitudes I take for granted are so rare as to be virtually unknown. And most people's typical idea about how much complexity is a good, rarely gets defended, let alone explained to me. So I want to explain my attitude here, and maybe have a discussion about it. At the front page of ENworld right now, you can see a guy with an animated expression talking about Dungeons and Dragons, insisting that "the game can literally be anything you want," and that "anyone who has ever played in a childhood imagination game like, I dunno a tea party, knows how to play the game." This should be totally true. The unfortunate fact is that it's totally wrong. I don't know anyone else who plays with nothing but a blackboard, chalk, and a d20. I don't find people outside my gaming group who sit down outside with paper and coins and a lantern and just [I]play[/I]. They never do. They need books. Not one, but many, books [I]plural[/I], full of instructions to tell them how to use their imaginations. They also need pots of dice, and miniature figures, and character sheets - oh, the character sheets they need. Not character cards, character concepts, character themes, or even character sheets in the singular with each player having one sheet. No we're talking about multiple [I]forms[/I] filled in and stapled together like a job application or this year's taxes. That almost all of you reading this find that kind of thing fun is something I realize. I get it. I do see that it is indeed true that most of you derive pleasure from all these rules and complications. But I want to at least point out that all of this * is expensive, * is time consuming to learn about, * slows your games down, * limits what you can do, and * creates confusion. I play to have an active, immersive, aesthetic, creative experience. I want to be taken away to another place, another time, and explore the beauty, and danger, and terror, and adventure and romance and glory and awe of another world. For me, that is the whole idea of roleplaying. And it seems obvious to me that complicated initiative protocols do not facilitate this. Things like mood music, a few candles, and the occasional illustration are what make this work. If you spend all your money, time, and energy on rules, you can't set up any atmosphere - you can't make a game that I want to play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why simpler - much simpler - is better
Top