Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Treebore" data-source="post: 3719543" data-attributes="member: 10177">I am starting to regret mentioning C&amp;C at all in this thread. My &quot;common sense&quot; told me not to mention it, but I convinced myself people would see why the many posts about C&amp;C and 3.5 would cause me to wonder about why people seem so eager to move on to 4E when so many said 3E was such a great gaming experience for them.Fortunately most people in this thread seem to understand what I am asking and why.Still, I get the over all point of your post. You play what gives you the game your looking for. So do I. So on that we are the same. We just found different games that give us what we want.I personally have no problem with 4E coming along. Its still D20 based. Its just going to be a new rules system from which I can lift rules and ideas that I like and incorporate into my game. Plus I am sure I will be able to adapt and use 4E modules just like I do 3E, maybe even easier considering what I am hearing about 4E. So for me I get the best of both worlds. A new D&amp;D system from which to get new ideas from, and an old one (3 old ones) from which I can continue to get ideas and use.So can we go back to the questions I asked in the OP and not try to derail this as some 3.5/C&amp;C fight?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Treebore, post: 3719543, member: 10177"] I am starting to regret mentioning C&C at all in this thread. My "common sense" told me not to mention it, but I convinced myself people would see why the many posts about C&C and 3.5 would cause me to wonder about why people seem so eager to move on to 4E when so many said 3E was such a great gaming experience for them. Fortunately most people in this thread seem to understand what I am asking and why. Still, I get the over all point of your post. You play what gives you the game your looking for. So do I. So on that we are the same. We just found different games that give us what we want. I personally have no problem with 4E coming along. Its still D20 based. Its just going to be a new rules system from which I can lift rules and ideas that I like and incorporate into my game. Plus I am sure I will be able to adapt and use 4E modules just like I do 3E, maybe even easier considering what I am hearing about 4E. So for me I get the best of both worlds. A new D&D system from which to get new ideas from, and an old one (3 old ones) from which I can continue to get ideas and use. So can we go back to the questions I asked in the OP and not try to derail this as some 3.5/C&C fight? [/QUOTE]

Verification