Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why Startrek is Dead (Opinion Thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="myrdden" data-source="post: 2133353" data-attributes="member: 549"><p>I definitely don't think Trek is dead, but its latest incarnation really didn't appeal much to me. I expected a prequel series filling in the gaps in Trek Lore and showing us the path to TOS, but instead ended up with a watered down version of TNG with extra heapings of time travel. Not what I was looking for at all...</p><p></p><p>I am a firm believer that when doing a prequel series, characterization becomes even more important than usual in a story because the general plot is already known. We KNOW there will be a Federation. We KNOW about the Romulans and the impending war. How can you keep it interesting when the outcome is already known? You create interesting characters that grow as the series grows and place them in situations that can allow for character development over plot. </p><p></p><p>The only character I actually liked on this show was Tripp because he seemed the most believable. His reactions and actions in some of the episodes were, IMO, a good example of how modern people - new to space exploration would react. The other characters either had no development (i.e.: Travis and Hoshi) or boring development (i.e.: T'Pol). Actually I liked Phlox too, but I felt both he and T'Pol were unnecessary additions. The show doesn't need alien foils to counter balance the human condition in this series because humans have yet to become the paragons of virtue in the later series. The crew should have been all human and complex in their interactions.</p><p></p><p>Of course Trek isn't exactly known for complex characterizations and maybe that's part of the problem. People's expectation of TV has changed. The episodic format may no longer be what people are yearning for. Maybe they want more immersive storytelling like BSG or Angel or even Firefly. I think part of the success of the 4th season has been the multi-episode arcs. They allow for more characterization and more involved stories which I think people are looking for more in TV.</p><p></p><p>It's too bad the series went the way it did. It did have some good ideas, some great production value and the odd really good episode. But overall I felt the show was floundering due to conflicting directions with my expectations and ultimately missing the mark for me. I expected a grittier version of Trek, lower technology, more focus on the original aliens that we've heard about but rarely seen (if ever) and a clear arc towards the Federation. The 4th season has been a large improvement (and I have no desire to bash B&B over the first 3 seasons - I think it's been done enough already) but I think it's too little too late.</p><p></p><p>Of course YMMV...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="myrdden, post: 2133353, member: 549"] I definitely don't think Trek is dead, but its latest incarnation really didn't appeal much to me. I expected a prequel series filling in the gaps in Trek Lore and showing us the path to TOS, but instead ended up with a watered down version of TNG with extra heapings of time travel. Not what I was looking for at all... I am a firm believer that when doing a prequel series, characterization becomes even more important than usual in a story because the general plot is already known. We KNOW there will be a Federation. We KNOW about the Romulans and the impending war. How can you keep it interesting when the outcome is already known? You create interesting characters that grow as the series grows and place them in situations that can allow for character development over plot. The only character I actually liked on this show was Tripp because he seemed the most believable. His reactions and actions in some of the episodes were, IMO, a good example of how modern people - new to space exploration would react. The other characters either had no development (i.e.: Travis and Hoshi) or boring development (i.e.: T'Pol). Actually I liked Phlox too, but I felt both he and T'Pol were unnecessary additions. The show doesn't need alien foils to counter balance the human condition in this series because humans have yet to become the paragons of virtue in the later series. The crew should have been all human and complex in their interactions. Of course Trek isn't exactly known for complex characterizations and maybe that's part of the problem. People's expectation of TV has changed. The episodic format may no longer be what people are yearning for. Maybe they want more immersive storytelling like BSG or Angel or even Firefly. I think part of the success of the 4th season has been the multi-episode arcs. They allow for more characterization and more involved stories which I think people are looking for more in TV. It's too bad the series went the way it did. It did have some good ideas, some great production value and the odd really good episode. But overall I felt the show was floundering due to conflicting directions with my expectations and ultimately missing the mark for me. I expected a grittier version of Trek, lower technology, more focus on the original aliens that we've heard about but rarely seen (if ever) and a clear arc towards the Federation. The 4th season has been a large improvement (and I have no desire to bash B&B over the first 3 seasons - I think it's been done enough already) but I think it's too little too late. Of course YMMV... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Why Startrek is Dead (Opinion Thread)
Top