Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the assumption that epic levels are purely optional?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gold Roger" data-source="post: 2858758" data-attributes="member: 33904"><p>Well, for one there's little appeal in even trying epic play, no matter how fun it could be.</p><p></p><p>-Once you've reached level 20, you most likely "have done it all" (bar killing powers, which is the crux of the current big argument). You've killed the dragons, visited hell, destroyed lichs, saved the country, saved the world (often multiple times) and sometimes even the multiverse. You've been entangled in politics and detangled yourself. 20th level, for me, sounds like the perfect point for "ok, next campaign"</p><p></p><p>-D&D already has plenty of "real ultimate power" already from 10 level forward. There's very little you can't do once you've reached 9th level spell. Most things you can't do are still well inside your powerlevel, but just not covered by the rules.</p><p></p><p>-Number crunching ever increases. I'm not to cry- omg, teh math killez me!!1one, but from 20th level on it simply gets a lot, and it simply doesn't appeal to everyone.</p><p></p><p>-If your play is more episodic, suspense of disbeliev could be hurt. Why are all these multiple planar spanning ultra threads comming up just now.</p><p></p><p>-The system, no matter how great it may play, doesn't exactly look appealing or well done.</p><p></p><p>-Related to the "done it all" a lot of epic play looks like "what you already did, but bigger!!111"</p><p></p><p>-There isn't really an appealing history of epic NPC's. The biggest epic NPC setting is FR, where they are seen more as annoyance or major weakness of the setting. To those that don't see it that way, they are more or less holy or untouchable NPC's. Many people with at least a little D&D experience have played or DMed FR. Many of these had frustrating deus-ex-machina, plot-stiffling or suspense of disbelieve hurting expiriences with those super DMs. I don't mean to bash FR, I still think it had it's success for a reason, but it hurt the image of epic levels.</p><p></p><p>-For some reason, it simply doesn't connect. It seems so...unexciting for something called epic.</p><p></p><p>There are other reasons.</p><p></p><p>All classes are all presented in the twenty level model. Epic stuff is always locked away in it's own area and often looks like an afterthought.</p><p></p><p>Really, the epic rules are only in the 3.5 DMG because there's no 3.5 epic book.</p><p></p><p>The game itself is in almost every way a twenty level game, casually looked at. It doesn't only give an almost complete expirience in twenty levels, but also creates the expectation of a complete experience. If epic was to be base assumption, why not remove the level cap altogether. (Bad idea, imho)</p><p></p><p>A lot of all this is prejudice and lack of promotion by wizards, but there are simply good reasons as well, I think.</p><p></p><p>I guess my main argument is that it's simply not needed. Like I've said, D&D 1-20 provides an almost complete expirience thanks to the four power levels (1-4 gritty survivalism, 5-9 fantastic fantasy, 10-14 superhero fantasy, 15-20 sorry, but that's already uber epic in my book). It gives all most people want and in many cases a bit more (just look at "sweet-spot" polls and up to what level many people play). Why chuck out the cherry of the cake, the very top of the heap and say "No, you've got to go epic with that"/eat a complete other pie.</p><p></p><p>At 20th level I've killed the orc, gimme ma pie.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gold Roger, post: 2858758, member: 33904"] Well, for one there's little appeal in even trying epic play, no matter how fun it could be. -Once you've reached level 20, you most likely "have done it all" (bar killing powers, which is the crux of the current big argument). You've killed the dragons, visited hell, destroyed lichs, saved the country, saved the world (often multiple times) and sometimes even the multiverse. You've been entangled in politics and detangled yourself. 20th level, for me, sounds like the perfect point for "ok, next campaign" -D&D already has plenty of "real ultimate power" already from 10 level forward. There's very little you can't do once you've reached 9th level spell. Most things you can't do are still well inside your powerlevel, but just not covered by the rules. -Number crunching ever increases. I'm not to cry- omg, teh math killez me!!1one, but from 20th level on it simply gets a lot, and it simply doesn't appeal to everyone. -If your play is more episodic, suspense of disbeliev could be hurt. Why are all these multiple planar spanning ultra threads comming up just now. -The system, no matter how great it may play, doesn't exactly look appealing or well done. -Related to the "done it all" a lot of epic play looks like "what you already did, but bigger!!111" -There isn't really an appealing history of epic NPC's. The biggest epic NPC setting is FR, where they are seen more as annoyance or major weakness of the setting. To those that don't see it that way, they are more or less holy or untouchable NPC's. Many people with at least a little D&D experience have played or DMed FR. Many of these had frustrating deus-ex-machina, plot-stiffling or suspense of disbelieve hurting expiriences with those super DMs. I don't mean to bash FR, I still think it had it's success for a reason, but it hurt the image of epic levels. -For some reason, it simply doesn't connect. It seems so...unexciting for something called epic. There are other reasons. All classes are all presented in the twenty level model. Epic stuff is always locked away in it's own area and often looks like an afterthought. Really, the epic rules are only in the 3.5 DMG because there's no 3.5 epic book. The game itself is in almost every way a twenty level game, casually looked at. It doesn't only give an almost complete expirience in twenty levels, but also creates the expectation of a complete experience. If epic was to be base assumption, why not remove the level cap altogether. (Bad idea, imho) A lot of all this is prejudice and lack of promotion by wizards, but there are simply good reasons as well, I think. I guess my main argument is that it's simply not needed. Like I've said, D&D 1-20 provides an almost complete expirience thanks to the four power levels (1-4 gritty survivalism, 5-9 fantastic fantasy, 10-14 superhero fantasy, 15-20 sorry, but that's already uber epic in my book). It gives all most people want and in many cases a bit more (just look at "sweet-spot" polls and up to what level many people play). Why chuck out the cherry of the cake, the very top of the heap and say "No, you've got to go epic with that"/eat a complete other pie. At 20th level I've killed the orc, gimme ma pie. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the assumption that epic levels are purely optional?
Top