Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Why the change in DR from 3.0 to 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Belzbet" data-source="post: 5874904" data-attributes="member: 6678902"><p>Because of a dragons magic, etc. I dont really think 1000archers can take on a dragon older than adult (or at least older than old) but in this scenario we are only talking about the 50 archers that passed their will save for frightful presence. The other 950 that get back into the game are just a plus, we can say that 50 archers can spread out 55ft from each other and still be in range of an attacking dragon, they may form a circle or a zigzag pattern, etc.' range increment of a longbow is 100ft and max range increment id 10 (or 1000ft) (and the range penalty to attack is not an issue since they can only ht on a crit. anyway). Also, a dragon may be smart but sometimes a dragon attacks a village for one reason or another (whay if they are qeas quested or dominated or simply just hungry, etc.). With this kind of reasoning we would say that a group of PC's can VERY RARELY kill a dragon (since they are SOOO smart they will retreat if their lives are threatened, and since they have AWESOME overland speed there are few PC groups that can keep up with a dragon; maybe this is how some DM's play dragons but...). Maybe they are very smart but I dont think the writers intended a dragons Int. to be a trump card for the battles that a dragon cannot beat (a dragon would never do this since they have an INT of 18, a dragon would retreat right when they see the number of archers, etc...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Belzbet, post: 5874904, member: 6678902"] Because of a dragons magic, etc. I dont really think 1000archers can take on a dragon older than adult (or at least older than old) but in this scenario we are only talking about the 50 archers that passed their will save for frightful presence. The other 950 that get back into the game are just a plus, we can say that 50 archers can spread out 55ft from each other and still be in range of an attacking dragon, they may form a circle or a zigzag pattern, etc.' range increment of a longbow is 100ft and max range increment id 10 (or 1000ft) (and the range penalty to attack is not an issue since they can only ht on a crit. anyway). Also, a dragon may be smart but sometimes a dragon attacks a village for one reason or another (whay if they are qeas quested or dominated or simply just hungry, etc.). With this kind of reasoning we would say that a group of PC's can VERY RARELY kill a dragon (since they are SOOO smart they will retreat if their lives are threatened, and since they have AWESOME overland speed there are few PC groups that can keep up with a dragon; maybe this is how some DM's play dragons but...). Maybe they are very smart but I dont think the writers intended a dragons Int. to be a trump card for the battles that a dragon cannot beat (a dragon would never do this since they have an INT of 18, a dragon would retreat right when they see the number of archers, etc...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Why the change in DR from 3.0 to 3.5
Top