Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Incenjucar" data-source="post: 6238835" data-attributes="member: 6182">Sorry to confuse you and set you on all that work! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> I meant the Ivory Tower article you linked and was just trying to be cute about it since it was an Essay that Revealed why so many of the options are sub-par.--Something to keep in mind: Balancing combat does NOT remove anything from the rest of the game except the range of effectiveness between new/casual players and old/hardcore/used-the-forums players.Now, if you prefer the old school wargame combat where the wizard is your deadly deadly artillery protected by the infantry and medic, instead of the new school &quot;just one of the troops&quot;, thing of 4E, hey, I can understand that. That's a totally legit thing, RTS videogames use that all the time! But a lot of people prefer to play D&amp;D like a band of equals instead.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Incenjucar, post: 6238835, member: 6182"] Sorry to confuse you and set you on all that work! :( I meant the Ivory Tower article you linked and was just trying to be cute about it since it was an Essay that Revealed why so many of the options are sub-par. -- Something to keep in mind: Balancing combat does NOT remove anything from the rest of the game except the range of effectiveness between new/casual players and old/hardcore/used-the-forums players. Now, if you prefer the old school wargame combat where the wizard is your deadly deadly artillery protected by the infantry and medic, instead of the new school "just one of the troops", thing of 4E, hey, I can understand that. That's a totally legit thing, RTS videogames use that all the time! But a lot of people prefer to play D&D like a band of equals instead. [/QUOTE]

Verification