Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6239163" data-attributes="member: 2525">You were debating something subjective concerning preferences for playstyles.&nbsp; They were no more wrong or right than you were wrong or right.&nbsp; It's a glaring thing when a guy who just arrived here, after proclaiming he had problems with mods at another board, tells a guy who has been here since the begging of the board (14 years or so) that his subjective opinion is wrong and he obviously lacks experience playing the game because if he had experience he'd agree with you.&nbsp; You don't see anything questionable about that approach to this debate? You think it's persuasive, or informative, to do that to your peers? Maybe I am wrong on this.&nbsp; Educate me, if I am.If nobody touches the guy who is paralyzed, and uses the time he is paralyzed to talk to him and try and persuade him to see things your way, then it was not a damaging spell.&nbsp; The damage only would come from something done after they are paralyzed, not the paralysis itself.&nbsp; Paralysis itself is not damage.&nbsp; It's not listed as &quot;paralysis damage&quot; in the rules either.&nbsp; It's not splitting hairs to say that paralysis is not damage.&nbsp; If it doesn't cause death or any hit point loss at all, it's not damage. Damage is measured by hit points and life.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6239163, member: 2525"] You were debating something subjective concerning preferences for playstyles. They were no more wrong or right than you were wrong or right. It's a glaring thing when a guy who just arrived here, after proclaiming he had problems with mods at another board, tells a guy who has been here since the begging of the board (14 years or so) that his subjective opinion is wrong and he obviously lacks experience playing the game because if he had experience he'd agree with you. You don't see anything questionable about that approach to this debate? You think it's persuasive, or informative, to do that to your peers? Maybe I am wrong on this. Educate me, if I am. If nobody touches the guy who is paralyzed, and uses the time he is paralyzed to talk to him and try and persuade him to see things your way, then it was not a damaging spell. The damage only would come from something done after they are paralyzed, not the paralysis itself. Paralysis itself is not damage. It's not listed as "paralysis damage" in the rules either. It's not splitting hairs to say that paralysis is not damage. If it doesn't cause death or any hit point loss at all, it's not damage. Damage is measured by hit points and life. [/QUOTE]

Verification