Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why the claim of combat and class balance between the classes is mainly a forum issue. (In my opinion)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 6249093" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>Encounter <strong>guidelines</strong> aren't rules... and players can still bitch about them... when the DM doesn't seem to be following them...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ok, first inherent bonuses are optional and only came later in supplemental material, I responded to a post that said they never had the problem in 4e... which means even before those rules appeared. Second, why wouldn't whether one can purchase a horse or not be under the purview of the DM? A little confused about that one...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I've found the reverse to be generally true in 4e, in other words while 4e may not cause a tpk when following the encounter guidelines, those guidelines also don't seem to offer much, if any, of a challenge once PC's are at paragon and above, when they are used as presented in the book. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>But the PC's can know this, especially if a DM isn't reskinning or leveling monsters (in the same way it would only be true in 3e if he isn't using class levels, templates or reskinning)... in that situation it works just like 3e. Beyond that PC's know what the encounter guidelines are for their PC's and after playing for a while get a feel for how difficult or not encounters should be. So no, I don't think it's that hard to judge and I've seen pplayers that straight out ask a DM what level was that encounter, when things didn't go their way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 6249093, member: 48965"] Encounter [B]guidelines[/B] aren't rules... and players can still bitch about them... when the DM doesn't seem to be following them... Ok, first inherent bonuses are optional and only came later in supplemental material, I responded to a post that said they never had the problem in 4e... which means even before those rules appeared. Second, why wouldn't whether one can purchase a horse or not be under the purview of the DM? A little confused about that one... And I've found the reverse to be generally true in 4e, in other words while 4e may not cause a tpk when following the encounter guidelines, those guidelines also don't seem to offer much, if any, of a challenge once PC's are at paragon and above, when they are used as presented in the book. But the PC's can know this, especially if a DM isn't reskinning or leveling monsters (in the same way it would only be true in 3e if he isn't using class levels, templates or reskinning)... in that situation it works just like 3e. Beyond that PC's know what the encounter guidelines are for their PC's and after playing for a while get a feel for how difficult or not encounters should be. So no, I don't think it's that hard to judge and I've seen pplayers that straight out ask a DM what level was that encounter, when things didn't go their way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why the claim of combat and class balance between the classes is mainly a forum issue. (In my opinion)
Top