Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7625134" data-attributes="member: 6919838">&quot;If you actually apply the proper use of language, you'd know what the sentence is saying, but it appears common sense is no longer applicable in reading.&quot;No, it appears common sense is no longer required by griping.See, here is the thing. Let's pretend you font like that druid armor rule.It's a stretch, I know.Let's assume you play D&amp;D 5e and choose a druid.Common sense would suggest that you, before or during chargen, talk to the GM about that rule to see if they are gonna de facto change it for you to something you like.But if you dont and you get into the gameplay and he does enforce it as written, suddenly its railroading? Nah, suddenly it's a player who knew of the issue, chose the class and also chose not to get this dearth with up-front. That's not a problem GMing. That's not a railroad. In my experience many GMs work with players and explain rules as needed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7625134, member: 6919838"] "If you actually apply the proper use of language, you'd know what the sentence is saying, but it appears common sense is no longer applicable in reading." No, it appears common sense is no longer required by griping. See, here is the thing. Let's pretend you font like that druid armor rule. It's a stretch, I know. Let's assume you play D&D 5e and choose a druid. Common sense would suggest that you, before or during chargen, talk to the GM about that rule to see if they are gonna de facto change it for you to something you like. But if you dont and you get into the gameplay and he does enforce it as written, suddenly its railroading? Nah, suddenly it's a player who knew of the issue, chose the class and also chose not to get this dearth with up-front. That's not a problem GMing. That's not a railroad. In my experience many GMs work with players and explain rules as needed. [/QUOTE]

Verification