Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JonnyP71" data-source="post: 7625419" data-attributes="member: 6788862">No, the bolded section does not says anything of the sort.  And to claim it does is wrong.  You're clutching at straws.I'm still waiting for any text specifically stated a Druid CAN wear metal if they choose to in 1E, or a Thief CAN wield a 2 handed sword.  All I've seen so far are wilful misinterpretations of clear wording in order to attempt, and fail, to prove a point.You know, a single line saying something like "A character may utilise weapons other than those listed as allowable for their class.  Doing so will involve applying the non-proficiency penalty."  If you can find this stated ANYWHERE in a 1E rulebook then your point stands.  If not, then it carries no weight.  Whatsoever.</blockquote>