Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="applenerd" data-source="post: 16355" data-attributes="member: 1051">I guess I don't have anything all that new to add but basically I'll just echo the fact that it seems like the players are insignificant when compared to the events and NPC's that surround them.&nbsp; When I play (or dm) I want to feel that my character (or my players) is going to make a difference.&nbsp; It's not that this wouldn't happen while playing FR but it's just a feeling I have about it.&nbsp; It's easy to be caught in the shadow of giants like Elminster or Drizzt.&nbsp; I used to do my own homebrew campaign but my most recent campaign has been in Greyhawk because of time constraints.&nbsp; &nbsp; In a lot of ways the FR campaign setting is a lot better than the Greyhawk book.&nbsp; The production value is certainly much better.&nbsp; They are both extremely well written.&nbsp; I guess like the others I just feel that FR is a bit saturated and Greyhawk is a template where I get to fill in the details as a dm.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="applenerd, post: 16355, member: 1051"] I guess I don't have anything all that new to add but basically I'll just echo the fact that it seems like the players are insignificant when compared to the events and NPC's that surround them. When I play (or dm) I want to feel that my character (or my players) is going to make a difference. It's not that this wouldn't happen while playing FR but it's just a feeling I have about it. It's easy to be caught in the shadow of giants like Elminster or Drizzt. I used to do my own homebrew campaign but my most recent campaign has been in Greyhawk because of time constraints. In a lot of ways the FR campaign setting is a lot better than the Greyhawk book. The production value is certainly much better. They are both extremely well written. I guess like the others I just feel that FR is a bit saturated and Greyhawk is a template where I get to fill in the details as a dm. [/QUOTE]

Verification