Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the hatred towards FRCS?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henry" data-source="post: 19615" data-attributes="member: 158"><p>Renshai said:</p><p></p><p></p><p>However, and my list is the only reason I point this out, The FRCS included a draft of those rules BEFORE they were even finished, BECAUSE decribing the main NPC's of the 'Realms was impossible without them. My point was rather that Epic levels are intrinsic to the setting, because so many characters there are above the Core range. Using Greyhawk and Dragonlance as an example, the PCs in those settings can be well-defined by using 20th level as a cap - even Mordenkainen, who has never shown any hint of power other than the abilities given in whatever edition he was printed under.</p><p></p><p></p><p>These things do not drive plots, but they ARE defining characteristics, because to outright say that you are removing them from the game or changing them takes away any difference between, say, the 'Realms and Greyhawk, or the 'Realms and Krynn. You can certainly downplay them for the sake of a campaign, but a cursory description of the Forgotten Realms always seems to include these elements, even from press distribution from TSR, and then WotC.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree with this, and here's why: If I am planning an epic campaign where Thay is going to war with Aglarond, and the PC's will be 17th to 20th level Aglarondans at the time I plan this, how are Elminster and the Simbul, if not half a million 15th + level Harpers and friends NOT going to be included in the plans? The PC's might be natural candidates for generalships and such, but the party mage is going to be "the Simbul's and Elminster's Assistant."</p><p></p><p>Alternately, if you want to run the return of the Shades from Netheril, the others are GOING to be involved. On an even lesser scale, if Orcs are about to overrun Silverymoon, you KNOW that Alustriel, Drizzt, some of the more competent warriors of Mithril Hall, and the leader of Silverymoon herself are going to step in. At no time would it make sense to "let Silverymoon fall if the PC's flub up", unless those worthies were physically incapable of doing so- say, being in Hell at the time.</p><p></p><p>For anything less than the invasion of a large city, it makes sense for the Major NPC's to not show their heads. Anything more epic than this, and having an NPC with an interest in the area NOT show up stretches the bounds of believability - unless you want to start a plot about the corruption of that particular NPC.</p><p></p><p>(Now THERE's a plot - Elminster has been seduced by, say, Bane, and has started to use his powers to aid the Church of Bane in overrunning the Dalelands. It's up to the PC's to redeem him - or take him out. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henry, post: 19615, member: 158"] Renshai said: However, and my list is the only reason I point this out, The FRCS included a draft of those rules BEFORE they were even finished, BECAUSE decribing the main NPC's of the 'Realms was impossible without them. My point was rather that Epic levels are intrinsic to the setting, because so many characters there are above the Core range. Using Greyhawk and Dragonlance as an example, the PCs in those settings can be well-defined by using 20th level as a cap - even Mordenkainen, who has never shown any hint of power other than the abilities given in whatever edition he was printed under. These things do not drive plots, but they ARE defining characteristics, because to outright say that you are removing them from the game or changing them takes away any difference between, say, the 'Realms and Greyhawk, or the 'Realms and Krynn. You can certainly downplay them for the sake of a campaign, but a cursory description of the Forgotten Realms always seems to include these elements, even from press distribution from TSR, and then WotC. I disagree with this, and here's why: If I am planning an epic campaign where Thay is going to war with Aglarond, and the PC's will be 17th to 20th level Aglarondans at the time I plan this, how are Elminster and the Simbul, if not half a million 15th + level Harpers and friends NOT going to be included in the plans? The PC's might be natural candidates for generalships and such, but the party mage is going to be "the Simbul's and Elminster's Assistant." Alternately, if you want to run the return of the Shades from Netheril, the others are GOING to be involved. On an even lesser scale, if Orcs are about to overrun Silverymoon, you KNOW that Alustriel, Drizzt, some of the more competent warriors of Mithril Hall, and the leader of Silverymoon herself are going to step in. At no time would it make sense to "let Silverymoon fall if the PC's flub up", unless those worthies were physically incapable of doing so- say, being in Hell at the time. For anything less than the invasion of a large city, it makes sense for the Major NPC's to not show their heads. Anything more epic than this, and having an NPC with an interest in the area NOT show up stretches the bounds of believability - unless you want to start a plot about the corruption of that particular NPC. (Now THERE's a plot - Elminster has been seduced by, say, Bane, and has started to use his powers to aid the Church of Bane in overrunning the Dalelands. It's up to the PC's to redeem him - or take him out. :)) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the hatred towards FRCS?
Top