Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5364412" data-attributes="member: 18280">I am no fan of 4e, and I am no longer playing 3e.&nbsp; I do not play Pathfinder.&nbsp; (I do, however, use 4e, 3e, and Pathfinder modules.)Being aware that these games have all attracted new players, though, I find that any discussion of why they will not do so founders upon the hard rocks of my experience.&nbsp; Likewise any discussion of how they are so good they will remove the need for any other games.They all have weaknesses and strengths.&nbsp; They all will appeal to some people more than others.&nbsp; They all will appeal to some people greatly, and to others not at all.The same thing is true for all earlier editions, all retroclones, all para-editions, and all game rulesets that don't fall under any of those categories.And, because it is the nature of the beast, there will be a 5e.&nbsp; And a 6e.&nbsp; Market forces -- and the law of diminishing returns -- demand that it should be so.RC</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5364412, member: 18280"] I am no fan of 4e, and I am no longer playing 3e. I do not play Pathfinder. (I do, however, use 4e, 3e, and Pathfinder modules.) Being aware that these games have all attracted new players, though, I find that any discussion of why they will not do so founders upon the hard rocks of my experience. Likewise any discussion of how they are so good they will remove the need for any other games. They all have weaknesses and strengths. They all will appeal to some people more than others. They all will appeal to some people greatly, and to others not at all. The same thing is true for all earlier editions, all retroclones, all para-editions, and all game rulesets that don't fall under any of those categories. And, because it is the nature of the beast, there will be a 5e. And a 6e. Market forces -- and the law of diminishing returns -- demand that it should be so. RC [/QUOTE]

Verification