Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Driddle" data-source="post: 1477519" data-attributes="member: 3447">Yes. Yes, I did: At the top of the list are fighters, rogues and committed spellcasters (wizards, clerics). With fighters, you get to refine the character concept via feats and weapons picks. Rogues get the skills, obviously. And even though mages and holy spellcasters have access to - potentially - the same spells as the next guy, the PC concept can be refined by specializing toward certain spell packages. Bards are almost as flexible when it comes to character-defining options, and rangers at least have two weapon specializations to pick from as well as their favored enemy focus. Animal companions and familiars are also ways to dress up certain classes so that the player can choose stuff.Perhaps you believe I intended to focus on combat because some of those options are, indeed, combat related. However, I'm looking at the bigger picture for each class, whether that involves combat or not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Driddle, post: 1477519, member: 3447"] Yes. Yes, I did: [I]At the top of the list are fighters, rogues and committed spellcasters (wizards, clerics). With fighters, you get to refine the character concept via feats and weapons picks. Rogues get the skills, obviously. And even though mages and holy spellcasters have access to - potentially - the same spells as the next guy, the PC concept can be refined by specializing toward certain spell packages. Bards are almost as flexible when it comes to character-defining options, and rangers at least have two weapon specializations to pick from as well as their favored enemy focus. Animal companions and familiars are also ways to dress up certain classes so that the player can choose stuff.[/I] Perhaps you believe I intended to focus on combat because some of those options are, indeed, combat related. However, I'm looking at the bigger picture for each class, whether that involves combat or not. [/QUOTE]

Verification