Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the World Exists
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Imaro" data-source="post: 4705800" data-attributes="member: 48965"><p>No one said the dragon couldn't (though looking at the dragons in the 4e MM, even a 1st level character has a chance to survive most if not all of their breath weapons so it wouldn't necessarily be instant death. I mean you are taking into consideration the rules of the actual game...right?).</p><p> </p><p>However if you're going to argue against simulationism or sandbox play (especially without consideration that for some people gameplay in an rpg sucks without simulationism), then it's important that the constraints of simulationism be addressed as well. In this context it is definitely important to establish the dragons, how, when, why and where and make sure it is consistent as it pertains to the gameworld, otherwise you are not ascribing to sandbox play or simulationism and are not being a fair referee or arbitrater (and this would be true no matter if your concerns were simulationism/narrativism or gamism).</p><p> </p><p>If it makes no sense for the PC's to be attacked by the dragon it's not really simulationist or close to realistic...is it? It is DM Fiat which is not what we are discussing. In a simulationist game the PC's often have the chance, because their is consistency and logic, to make choices that rely on... in-gameworld logic, trickery, cunning, etc. to get out of situations that approaching with direct combat would probably result in their death. Is this good gameplay? Certainly for those who enjoy matching their wits and cunning against the gameworld as opposed to the mechanics. But it is not achieved in the same manner you seem to insinuate good gameplay takes place in (level-appropriate challenges)</p><p> </p><p>And again I want to point out that your example avoids any application of the actual game rules. If the dragon rolls a series of ones on it's breath attack... the PC survives because the Dragon didn't kill him, so no the DM doesn't have the right to still make him die. If the PC's are in a cave to small and too far underground for the dragon to attack them, then no the DM cannot (if he is doing sandbox play) auto-rule the PC's still died.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Imaro, post: 4705800, member: 48965"] No one said the dragon couldn't (though looking at the dragons in the 4e MM, even a 1st level character has a chance to survive most if not all of their breath weapons so it wouldn't necessarily be instant death. I mean you are taking into consideration the rules of the actual game...right?). However if you're going to argue against simulationism or sandbox play (especially without consideration that for some people gameplay in an rpg sucks without simulationism), then it's important that the constraints of simulationism be addressed as well. In this context it is definitely important to establish the dragons, how, when, why and where and make sure it is consistent as it pertains to the gameworld, otherwise you are not ascribing to sandbox play or simulationism and are not being a fair referee or arbitrater (and this would be true no matter if your concerns were simulationism/narrativism or gamism). If it makes no sense for the PC's to be attacked by the dragon it's not really simulationist or close to realistic...is it? It is DM Fiat which is not what we are discussing. In a simulationist game the PC's often have the chance, because their is consistency and logic, to make choices that rely on... in-gameworld logic, trickery, cunning, etc. to get out of situations that approaching with direct combat would probably result in their death. Is this good gameplay? Certainly for those who enjoy matching their wits and cunning against the gameworld as opposed to the mechanics. But it is not achieved in the same manner you seem to insinuate good gameplay takes place in (level-appropriate challenges) And again I want to point out that your example avoids any application of the actual game rules. If the dragon rolls a series of ones on it's breath attack... the PC survives because the Dragon didn't kill him, so no the DM doesn't have the right to still make him die. If the PC's are in a cave to small and too far underground for the dragon to attack them, then no the DM cannot (if he is doing sandbox play) auto-rule the PC's still died. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Why the World Exists
Top