Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why UA Psionics are never going to work in 5e.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Marandahir" data-source="post: 7976091" data-attributes="member: 6803643"><p>Oh, one other thought though:</p><p></p><p>I'd totally be up for a 5.5e where Sorcerer doesn't require components for spells but has other restrictions, and can use Int, Wis, or Cha as its casting stat (and thus allows Psion as a very clear concept of it).</p><p></p><p>If we HAVE to have a Psion class, then yeah, use the Sorcerer as a chassis, switch to spell points (merge pool with Sorcery points), change to Int casting, remove components, switch up the spell list to be mostly illusions, enchantments, and conjurations, plus some elemental evocation spells due to things like pyrokinesis. Give it some sort of additional restriction to make up for component requirement removal. Maybe even fewer spells known? I'm not sure. </p><p></p><p>But Sorcerer is incredibly close to the language of the Psion. It speaks a lot to how Ability Scores have restricted the narrative malleability of casters while not so much for martial characters (who might be Str based or might be Dex based depending on build). I could see Int-based Clerics, Wis-based Wizards, Cha-based Druids, Int-based Sorcerers, Int-based Warlocks, Cha-based Wizards, even Wis or Int-based Bards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Marandahir, post: 7976091, member: 6803643"] Oh, one other thought though: I'd totally be up for a 5.5e where Sorcerer doesn't require components for spells but has other restrictions, and can use Int, Wis, or Cha as its casting stat (and thus allows Psion as a very clear concept of it). If we HAVE to have a Psion class, then yeah, use the Sorcerer as a chassis, switch to spell points (merge pool with Sorcery points), change to Int casting, remove components, switch up the spell list to be mostly illusions, enchantments, and conjurations, plus some elemental evocation spells due to things like pyrokinesis. Give it some sort of additional restriction to make up for component requirement removal. Maybe even fewer spells known? I'm not sure. But Sorcerer is incredibly close to the language of the Psion. It speaks a lot to how Ability Scores have restricted the narrative malleability of casters while not so much for martial characters (who might be Str based or might be Dex based depending on build). I could see Int-based Clerics, Wis-based Wizards, Cha-based Druids, Int-based Sorcerers, Int-based Warlocks, Cha-based Wizards, even Wis or Int-based Bards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why UA Psionics are never going to work in 5e.
Top