Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why UA Psionics are never going to work in 5e.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 7978708"><p>Perfectly symmetric. In either case you either settle for a game that doesn't perfectly suit your preferences, or you jump through a few hoops to make it so. If you don't understand something as simple as that, I'll have to take a pass at explaining it further. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How are you not embarrassed at impugning my motives and character upthread?</p><p></p><p>But perhaps I am as blind to the hollowness of my own arguments as you are to yours.</p><p></p><p>It does occur to me, to give you a hefty slice of benefit of the doubt, that we just see the game differently. </p><p></p><p>I didn't play D&D for many years, and skipped 3e and 4e. It seems to have gone gonzo high-fantasy in the interim, with a huge explosion in character options, and it It became the "kitchen sink" game, discussed elsewhere, that I really don't like. The more concepts it includes under one big tent the less I like it. There's already a TON of official content that I really don't like, and, yes, it lessens my experience in practice. To the extent possible I hope they stop adding more household appliances to the mix.</p><p></p><p>I have a strong preference for games which are narrowly focused, both in terms of genre and character options. I won't bother going into (and thus starting an argument about) the reasons why, but that's my preference. I've played a wide array of games, with a huge range in character options, and I tend to enjoy the ones that have fewer character options that reinforce a specific flavor and setting.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps you see the kitchen-sink approach as intrinsic to the game, even the defining characteristic of D&D. Perhaps you can't see any downside to making it broader and more generic. Perhaps if somebody showed up at the table with a Jedi knight, complete with (mechanically balanced) light saber and pet droid, warped in through some kind of temporal rift, your reaction would be to think that's just freakin' awesome. (Spoiler alert: that would not be my reaction.). </p><p></p><p>Is that accurate? If so, it might explain why you are unable to comprehend my position.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This suggests you have no idea what the term 'gatekeeping' refers to, and/or you assume greatly exaggerated powers on my part to influence WotC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 6801328, post: 7978708"] Perfectly symmetric. In either case you either settle for a game that doesn't perfectly suit your preferences, or you jump through a few hoops to make it so. If you don't understand something as simple as that, I'll have to take a pass at explaining it further. How are you not embarrassed at impugning my motives and character upthread? But perhaps I am as blind to the hollowness of my own arguments as you are to yours. It does occur to me, to give you a hefty slice of benefit of the doubt, that we just see the game differently. I didn't play D&D for many years, and skipped 3e and 4e. It seems to have gone gonzo high-fantasy in the interim, with a huge explosion in character options, and it It became the "kitchen sink" game, discussed elsewhere, that I really don't like. The more concepts it includes under one big tent the less I like it. There's already a TON of official content that I really don't like, and, yes, it lessens my experience in practice. To the extent possible I hope they stop adding more household appliances to the mix. I have a strong preference for games which are narrowly focused, both in terms of genre and character options. I won't bother going into (and thus starting an argument about) the reasons why, but that's my preference. I've played a wide array of games, with a huge range in character options, and I tend to enjoy the ones that have fewer character options that reinforce a specific flavor and setting. Perhaps you see the kitchen-sink approach as intrinsic to the game, even the defining characteristic of D&D. Perhaps you can't see any downside to making it broader and more generic. Perhaps if somebody showed up at the table with a Jedi knight, complete with (mechanically balanced) light saber and pet droid, warped in through some kind of temporal rift, your reaction would be to think that's just freakin' awesome. (Spoiler alert: that would not be my reaction.). Is that accurate? If so, it might explain why you are unable to comprehend my position. This suggests you have no idea what the term 'gatekeeping' refers to, and/or you assume greatly exaggerated powers on my part to influence WotC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Why UA Psionics are never going to work in 5e.
Top