Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest 6801328" data-source="post: 7985754">Just to clarify, I'm not saying you need infinite subclasses, or even a lot of them.  I'm only saying that if the basis you are using for designing subclasses is obviously finite in some way (as it would be if, for example, the Fighter subclasses were "Great Weapon Wielder", "Archer", "Shield Master", and "Dual Wielder") that might a good sign that you're picking an overly narrow and uninteresting way of designing your subclasses.In my opinion, the implementation of the original Wizard subclasses is kind of lame.  Who picks a Wizard subclass because of the school, as opposed to picking whichever one has the one (or maybe two) most useful abilities?  How many of us have played a Divination wizard as, well, a diviner?  At least in my experience, the Divination wizard is just a regular old wizard...or even an Evoker, if you want to look at spell choice and use...with a really powerful trick up their sleeve.</blockquote>