Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Why Vancian spellcasting is good for the game (and should mostly be in 4e)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 3760353" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>Or: the only things I would change about Vancian spellcasting are the number of spell slots and the per day refresh.</p><p></p><p>Originally posted <a href="http://www.circvsmaximvs.com/showthread.php?t=31090" target="_blank">here</a>.</p><p></p><p>This is a little piece of insight that just dawned on me. The maneuver system in Bo9S and the per encounter spellcasting system that, in all likelihood, we are going to see in 4e are both about three-quarters Vancian. In my view, the better three-quarters, but that's getting a little ahead of myself.</p><p></p><p>Having only read one short story by Vance myself (something that had spells like <em>excellent prismatic spray</em> and <em>whispered shout</em>, and a magic item called <em>live boots</em>), I might actually be wrong about the following. However, the characteristics of a Vancian spellcasting system appear to me to be as follows:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>1. Spells have pre-determined, fixed effects</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">When you want to create a fiery explosion, you cast <em>fireball</em>. You don't make up a spell from scratch in the course of the game. In addition, beyond certain (again) pre-determined degrees of freedom, you don't change the spell's parameters on the fly.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">This generally results in faster gameplay. By narrowing down a spellcaster's options and reducing the need to make many decisions and calculations on the fly, the player spends less time deciding what to do and determining the effects of his action.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>2. Spells are "stored" or "prepared" in slots</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">This generally means less bookkeeping, at least when compared to a spell point system.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>3. Each spellcaster has a small number of spell slots</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">In the story, the wizard could prepare no more than four spells (I think) at a time. From a narrative perspective, it helps build tension as the spells are used one by one. Of course, as a story, you couldn't let the wizard have too many spells without making it an extremely long and probably rather boring tale. More importantly, most readers will have a hard time remembering all the spells the wizard started out with, which he has used, and which he has left at any one time.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Similarly, in the game, a smaller number of spell slots helps a player remember the options he has available to him at any one time. High-level D&D spellcasters are thus already not very Vancian in this respect. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"><strong>4. Spells may only be prepared when the spellcaster's mind is fresh</strong></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">In the story, this meant a good night's sleep, which sets a cap on the wizard's resources and helps the previously-mentioned building of tension because there is no way for him to regain his resources.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Similarly, in the game, this has historically also meant a good night's sleep (except for divine spellcasters in 3e), which again helps to build tension from dwindling resources and to encourage good resource management, but only if the players are faced with some kind of time limit. If not, in extreme cases, this could lead to the so-called 15-minute adventuring day, but I would expect that most of the time, the PCs would just continue adventuring until sufficiently drained of resources to recognize the need for rest, and this could take a variable amount of time depending on what happens between encounters.</p><p>So, looking at the Bo9S maneuver system and the possible per encounter spells in 4e, it looks like characteristics #1, #2, and #3 will still be there. #4 is changed somewhat - the length of the rest period has simply changed from 8 hours to (possibly) 1 minute.</p><p></p><p>So, Vancian spellcasting is not dead. At least 75% of it should be in 4e, and because of fewer spell slots, it will be even more Vancian than ever! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 3760353, member: 3424"] Or: the only things I would change about Vancian spellcasting are the number of spell slots and the per day refresh. Originally posted [URL=http://www.circvsmaximvs.com/showthread.php?t=31090]here[/URL]. This is a little piece of insight that just dawned on me. The maneuver system in Bo9S and the per encounter spellcasting system that, in all likelihood, we are going to see in 4e are both about three-quarters Vancian. In my view, the better three-quarters, but that's getting a little ahead of myself. Having only read one short story by Vance myself (something that had spells like [I]excellent prismatic spray[/I] and [I]whispered shout[/I], and a magic item called [I]live boots[/I]), I might actually be wrong about the following. However, the characteristics of a Vancian spellcasting system appear to me to be as follows: [INDENT][B]1. Spells have pre-determined, fixed effects[/B] When you want to create a fiery explosion, you cast [I]fireball[/I]. You don't make up a spell from scratch in the course of the game. In addition, beyond certain (again) pre-determined degrees of freedom, you don't change the spell's parameters on the fly. This generally results in faster gameplay. By narrowing down a spellcaster's options and reducing the need to make many decisions and calculations on the fly, the player spends less time deciding what to do and determining the effects of his action. [B]2. Spells are "stored" or "prepared" in slots[/B] This generally means less bookkeeping, at least when compared to a spell point system. [B]3. Each spellcaster has a small number of spell slots[/B] In the story, the wizard could prepare no more than four spells (I think) at a time. From a narrative perspective, it helps build tension as the spells are used one by one. Of course, as a story, you couldn't let the wizard have too many spells without making it an extremely long and probably rather boring tale. More importantly, most readers will have a hard time remembering all the spells the wizard started out with, which he has used, and which he has left at any one time. Similarly, in the game, a smaller number of spell slots helps a player remember the options he has available to him at any one time. High-level D&D spellcasters are thus already not very Vancian in this respect. :p [B]4. Spells may only be prepared when the spellcaster's mind is fresh[/B] In the story, this meant a good night's sleep, which sets a cap on the wizard's resources and helps the previously-mentioned building of tension because there is no way for him to regain his resources. Similarly, in the game, this has historically also meant a good night's sleep (except for divine spellcasters in 3e), which again helps to build tension from dwindling resources and to encourage good resource management, but only if the players are faced with some kind of time limit. If not, in extreme cases, this could lead to the so-called 15-minute adventuring day, but I would expect that most of the time, the PCs would just continue adventuring until sufficiently drained of resources to recognize the need for rest, and this could take a variable amount of time depending on what happens between encounters.[/INDENT]So, looking at the Bo9S maneuver system and the possible per encounter spells in 4e, it looks like characteristics #1, #2, and #3 will still be there. #4 is changed somewhat - the length of the rest period has simply changed from 8 hours to (possibly) 1 minute. So, Vancian spellcasting is not dead. At least 75% of it should be in 4e, and because of fewer spell slots, it will be even more Vancian than ever! :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Older Editions
Why Vancian spellcasting is good for the game (and should mostly be in 4e)
Top