Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="wingsandsword" data-source="post: 2583075" data-attributes="member: 14159">I hope you don't get any information about Roleplaying games from reading these message boards, since these posts don't have professional editors and fact checkers, same goes for most web pages in general.  I hope you don't take what your friends/co-workers/acquaintances tell you seriously either, since what they said wasn't verified and edited.  You recieve most of the information we receive is actually from unverified and unedited sources, you just don't realize it.   Wikipedia is another layer on that.Wikipedia isn't a definiative, authoritative resource you'd do serious research or cite in an academic context, but it's a good general reference that is well known, quick, and extremely broad in its scope.  I'm an avid reader (and contributor) to wikipedia, but I have no illusions about it being some definiative and authoritative reference.  If I cited it in an academic context, I'd expect to have a very irate professor and a very low grade.  Amusingly enough, I have seen it used for educational purposes though, a friend of mine is in a class this semester where one lesson was that the instructor printed out a copy of the wikipedia article on the subject they were studying, and the assignment was to find the errors, which the class would discuss and debate, and then they correct the article, providing citations for all their information within the article, and a note on the corresponding Talk page about the corrections to the article.In fact, the ability of Wikipedia to be edited by anybody largely works to its advantage.  IME, most of the time most editors are trying to help out and contribute what they can and talk about what they know.  While you have anonymous editors and troublemakers (who get banned), IME most of the contributors are knowledgable and well meaning folks who write about what they know.  With this, you end up with well written articles on minor subjects that a major encyclopedia would never bother with.  Are those articles the sort of thing you'd stake your reputation on?  No way, but they are the sort of thing that could start you looking into the field, or give you an idea on it before checking other sources.  Due to it's sheer breadth, for some obscure sources Wikipedia is one of the few references on the web because the raw number of contributors means that somebody has had something to say about it.</blockquote>

Verification