Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why won't you switch?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 4056663" data-attributes="member: 2067"><p>It's not objective, and it's not falsifiable. It's an opinion statement, and it's presented as if it's something "everyone knows."</p><p></p><p>Not everyone knows it. Plenty of people don't have these issues that WotC so graciously has decided to "fix." When they say "it sucks," it can really sound like they're saying "It's bad, and if you like it, you have bad taste, because what's REALLY good is what's coming up in a few months!"</p><p></p><p>If they said something more objective -- like "The grapple rules are pretty complex, and we're going to simplify them," it may go over better. It's more specific, it gives us more information, and it allows us to use our own judgment about whether or not we're interested in their fix. "Ah, I've got no problem with the complexity, I don't need that!" or "Ah! That's been annoying me for so long! I'm glad they made it simpler!"</p><p></p><p>Saying "These rules are bad and we will make them better," isn't saying much, and it isn't an opinion everyone shares. Those two things are a deadly combination: if you're saying something people are going to dispute, ground it in concrete information. If you're giving your opinion only, don't state it categorically.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I'm A Banana, post: 4056663, member: 2067"] It's not objective, and it's not falsifiable. It's an opinion statement, and it's presented as if it's something "everyone knows." Not everyone knows it. Plenty of people don't have these issues that WotC so graciously has decided to "fix." When they say "it sucks," it can really sound like they're saying "It's bad, and if you like it, you have bad taste, because what's REALLY good is what's coming up in a few months!" If they said something more objective -- like "The grapple rules are pretty complex, and we're going to simplify them," it may go over better. It's more specific, it gives us more information, and it allows us to use our own judgment about whether or not we're interested in their fix. "Ah, I've got no problem with the complexity, I don't need that!" or "Ah! That's been annoying me for so long! I'm glad they made it simpler!" Saying "These rules are bad and we will make them better," isn't saying much, and it isn't an opinion everyone shares. Those two things are a deadly combination: if you're saying something people are going to dispute, ground it in concrete information. If you're giving your opinion only, don't state it categorically. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Why won't you switch?
Top