Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AllisterH" data-source="post: 4056979" data-attributes="member: 51325">You're kidding right? SKR at the time of 3E was basically the only WOTC/TSR guy that seemed to have net access and from his spiels on rec.games.frp.dnd (yes, I remember SKR just after he became TSR's netrep), he was NEVER quiet about what he thought was wrongNot necessarily. It depends on how much work it requires I'd assume. For example, I don't see why running adventures in any edition as long as someone did the conversions of monsters for you.Any edition change IME is going to cause people to be offended but worse to me, is an edition change that doesn't really change anything. CoC I always thought was a bad example of &quot;edition&quot; change for the sake of getting people to buy it again. Pre-Internet, I didn't realize there wasn't that much of a difference between 1st, 2nd and 3rd edition CoC and yet I bought each subsequent book because I thought it was totally different...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AllisterH, post: 4056979, member: 51325"] You're kidding right? SKR at the time of 3E was basically the only WOTC/TSR guy that seemed to have net access and from his spiels on rec.games.frp.dnd (yes, I remember SKR just after he became TSR's netrep), he was NEVER quiet about what he thought was wrong Not necessarily. It depends on how much work it requires I'd assume. For example, I don't see why running adventures in any edition as long as someone did the conversions of monsters for you. Any edition change IME is going to cause people to be offended but worse to me, is an edition change that doesn't really change anything. CoC I always thought was a bad example of "edition" change for the sake of getting people to buy it again. Pre-Internet, I didn't realize there wasn't that much of a difference between 1st, 2nd and 3rd edition CoC and yet I bought each subsequent book because I thought it was totally different... [/QUOTE]

Verification